Sick, sick, sick!
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chino Valley, Az.
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok,
let's assume 5.29 r/p
first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95
and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each
for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!
__________
BUT,
add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1
add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1
and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1
___________
But wait, we're not done yet!
how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?
that gets us to 2850 to 1
tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
let's assume 5.29 r/p
first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95
and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each
for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!
__________
BUT,
add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1
add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1
and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1
___________
But wait, we're not done yet!
how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?
that gets us to 2850 to 1
tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The customer shifters are going to extreme pain to fabricate.
Was the intended for a 4runner or a on-going joke
supporting the local 4x4 shop?
And to accoring to Crawler#976 excellent calculations
@ that gets us to 2850 to 1. It would be insane to place
so much torgue on the universals or drive lines.
Maybe it's time to break out the Insanity Clause.
:xmas13:
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, SC
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by crawler#976
ok,
let's assume 5.29 r/p
first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95
and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each
for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!
__________
BUT,
add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1
add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1
and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1
___________
But wait, we're not done yet!
how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?
that gets us to 2850 to 1
tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
ok,
let's assume 5.29 r/p
first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95
and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each
for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!
__________
BUT,
add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1
add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1
and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1
___________
But wait, we're not done yet!
how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?
that gets us to 2850 to 1
tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
Keep assuming 5.29s in the diffs.
given that the picture appears to be a R150F with two R1FA reduction housings and then a V1FA t-case.
stock ratios would give you:
3.83 x 2.28 x 2.28 x 2.56 x 5.29 = 270:1
with dual 4.7s:
3.83 x 4.7 x 4.7 x 2.56 x 5.29 = 1146:1
I assume you added an extra 1 in your ratio scott. I believe my second calculation is what you actually have there in the picture. To answer your question, I only see one...
Last edited by 44Runner; 12-19-2003 at 01:16 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the page, go to the very bottom. 3.83x4.7x4.7x2.57x5.29 for the final ratio of 1150:1
And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"
Originally posted by 44Runner I assume you added an extra 1 in your ratio scott
Last edited by scott.475; 12-19-2003 at 01:36 PM.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, SC
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scott.475
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Conyers, GA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scott.475
Here is the page, go to the very bottom. 3.83x4.7x4.7x2.57x5.29 for the final ratio of 1150:1
And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
Here is the page, go to the very bottom. 3.83x4.7x4.7x2.57x5.29 for the final ratio of 1150:1
And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep Gap, NC
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's pretty awesome! It looks as if all you need is traction, and you're good to go. I'd say slightly lower gears would be nice for over here in the east, but something that low would be useless due to traction issues with mud and slick rocks here in the east. Very impressive!
Chris
Chris
#17
Contributing Member
I'm perfectly happy with my 151:1 (with the ability to go to 724:1 if wanted) and more than a foot less length. And I've essentially got three cases if you count the granny low as a 1.98:1 case multipied by a 3.55 first gear (7.05:1 overall ratio).
Last edited by toy283; 01-03-2004 at 12:31 PM.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milton, WA
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm dropping down a little. I actually found the 2.8 - 4.7 - 5.29 a little low. My dana 60s have 4.10 gears. I'm not about to change them. I think I'll llike the slightly higher gearing on the trails, but on the road... I'll be glad I have 2wd low.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
highonpottery
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
7
07-18-2015 02:48 PM
PureTacoma_Tundra
PureTacoma_Tundra
0
07-02-2015 12:35 PM