1999 4Runner Straight Axle Conversion Webcam - Tune in starting Feb. 2, 2005
#281
Originally Posted by Stump1883
Might be a stupid question but what is stopping us form using the SAWs that we already have(to keep the lift minimal) and just hooking them up with a solid axel and some links, and possibley changing the coils to a higher rate(for the added weight of a solid axel)? Someone shoot me down and educate me in the same breath.
#283
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
schaefer, i gotta say that is nice work. Im also curious as to why you would do an sas with spring under and shackles forward when all the others i have seen are exactly the opposite. Its nice to see someone do their own thing but are there any other reasons why you built it like this?
#284
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
No you are. Start saving up tight wad. We're gonna cut your truck up.
I don't know if Cheese or Hunt will be next. It will be hard to say. Neither have really started seriously gathering parts, so who knows.
I don't know if Cheese or Hunt will be next. It will be hard to say. Neither have really started seriously gathering parts, so who knows.
#285
Registered User
Why not use SAW's? Because I think that severely limits the places you can head with the project. A roughly 8" travel coilover is really short. Most trucks head to 14 and get longer from there.
SteveO is next. I have no bucks and big dreams. All bets are off if that job at the adult call center works out.
SteveO, I think links would work well for you, especially for the approach angle and bumper considerations. There is a shop making a kit, but I am not sure if you will buy from them.
Links or leaves, when done right, will offer the same travel. The coilover offers adjustability and tuneability.
Peace, I'm out.
SteveO is next. I have no bucks and big dreams. All bets are off if that job at the adult call center works out.
SteveO, I think links would work well for you, especially for the approach angle and bumper considerations. There is a shop making a kit, but I am not sure if you will buy from them.
Links or leaves, when done right, will offer the same travel. The coilover offers adjustability and tuneability.
Peace, I'm out.
#286
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Albuquerque Jim
So I will wait until you all SAS and wheel them to work out the bugs. By that time I might have my truck paid off.
#287
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bamachem
because saws suck. done. yer welcome.
Stump-You'd have to use these-
The ones that fit our trucks are way too small. The ones they are using are 14" or 16" with 2 coils w/different spring rates like 400ppi over 200ppi for the front end and 250 over 150's for the rear.
#288
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I talked to alot of people in the industry, not on any BBS, like Randy Ellis and Mark Mason and alot of others and they said all the effort to build links was not worth it in the end. They also said there would be many revisions to get it right.
Mark Mason was one of the first guys with front coil springs on a Toyota SA. That truck/buggie now rolls on leaf springs after a disasterous year or so with SAW's.
Randy Ellis said "HE" could build me a front link system but doubted that I would get it right the first time. He said leafs are a no brainer.
I did spring under to keep the lift low. I also like to think outside the box. I just don't copy everyone elses products and sell them for less. I strive to come up with all original ideas.
I got the motor running today and the 4WD light works again. The ABS has been electonically disabled and the hardware will get pulled as soon as my non-Abs brake lines come in from Japan.
Mark Mason was one of the first guys with front coil springs on a Toyota SA. That truck/buggie now rolls on leaf springs after a disasterous year or so with SAW's.
Randy Ellis said "HE" could build me a front link system but doubted that I would get it right the first time. He said leafs are a no brainer.
I did spring under to keep the lift low. I also like to think outside the box. I just don't copy everyone elses products and sell them for less. I strive to come up with all original ideas.
I got the motor running today and the 4WD light works again. The ABS has been electonically disabled and the hardware will get pulled as soon as my non-Abs brake lines come in from Japan.
#291
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve,
Congratulations on the SAS!
I have never seen/read about SAS done with so much care to details.
The list of parts is more than very impressive.
We all know that doing all the work yourself (with help of the other noblemen) gave you a lot of pain,
but I would guess a lot of experience too.
I don't know what you do for the living, but... have you ever thought about opening a full-time 4WD Shop?
All the fabrication that you do anyway, now experience in "custom" work...
I see people on waiting list for SAS done to their 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation...
I know, I know, that would be perfect but life is not.
Well, anyway...
I was just wondering what did you do about gears in the rear axle.
As far as I remember you had 5.29 in the rear, now 5.38 in front ... ?
PS
I don't care what people say about under the axle springs setup - I love the stance
and the feel of sturdiness of the whole thing. Way to go!
Congratulations on the SAS!
I have never seen/read about SAS done with so much care to details.
The list of parts is more than very impressive.
We all know that doing all the work yourself (with help of the other noblemen) gave you a lot of pain,
but I would guess a lot of experience too.
I don't know what you do for the living, but... have you ever thought about opening a full-time 4WD Shop?
All the fabrication that you do anyway, now experience in "custom" work...
I see people on waiting list for SAS done to their 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation...
I know, I know, that would be perfect but life is not.
Well, anyway...
I was just wondering what did you do about gears in the rear axle.
As far as I remember you had 5.29 in the rear, now 5.38 in front ... ?
PS
I don't care what people say about under the axle springs setup - I love the stance
and the feel of sturdiness of the whole thing. Way to go!
#293
Originally Posted by Stump1883
I don't want to be "that guy" but how else can I learn. WHY? <--Me
Different suspension designs have different motion-ratios. The motion ratio (or leverage ratio) means how many inches does the shock shaft move in relation to the wheel travel. IFS trucks are a linkage type system and they use more leverage to get travel out of a shorter shock than most live axle vehicles. The only live axle vehicles that have an other than 1:1 motion ratio are linked suspensions with the shocks mounted to the links as opposed to being mounted to the axle directly. Then you can decide the motion ratio based on how far up the link the shock is mounted. Any motion ratio under 2:1 is considered acceptable but 1:1 is ideal in terms of damping performance. Our trucks (depending on what shocks are installed) have a motion ratio of about ~1.75:1 FWIW.
You would actually need to decrease the spring rate for a straight axle becasue with a lower motion ratio there is less leverage on the shock. Also the additional weight of the axle itself is unsprung weight so it has zero effect on the sring rate, the springs only suspend the main vehicle's weight (not axles or wheels etc). So where many of us run 550-600# springs on our coil-overs, we could get away with about 350# with a straight axle.
I hope this clears it up for you a little
#295
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Susanville, CA.
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The finished product came out so well. Trying to keep a shaft true that has to be extended then add to that the flange (also needing to have 0 TR) is quite the chore. I'm happy, and when Steve gets this maybe he'll be able to finally drive!!!!!!!!!
Richard
Richard
Last edited by weldpro; 02-10-2005 at 12:59 AM.
#296
Originally Posted by RobT2k
uh, ok that is why some of the best coilover supspended trucks on pirate have them?
Stump-You'd have to use these-
The ones that fit our trucks are way too small. The ones they are using are 14" or 16" with 2 coils w/different spring rates like 400ppi over 200ppi for the front end and 250 over 150's for the rear.
Stump-You'd have to use these-
The ones that fit our trucks are way too small. The ones they are using are 14" or 16" with 2 coils w/different spring rates like 400ppi over 200ppi for the front end and 250 over 150's for the rear.
Ummmm, maybe you didn't catch that SMILEY FACE at the end?
I realize that alot of buggys are coilover. I'm not a freakin' noob. However, I also know that the IFS SAWS have a high spring rate. You take that and put it on a SFA and you'll ride like your sittin' on rocks. You need lower spring rates for SFA because the pivot point of the front suspension moves all the way over to the other side of the vehicle. That means less leverage to compress the spring and therefore you want a lower spring rate. Then you get into travel distance issues as well like Cheese mentioned. Why go SAS and keep the same travel distance AND maintain a stiff ride? It just doesn't make much sense either way. The IFS SAWS are for high speed desert racing and street handling. They were NEVER meant for crawling where you want soft, flexy, and LOOONNG TRAVEL. The SA SAWS that are used on buggys ARE menat for crawling and seem to flex well.
Now, back to the regularly scheduled program...
[edit: oh well, i see that sean beat me to the punch]
Last edited by bamachem; 02-10-2005 at 07:56 AM.
#297
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, SC
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SEAN_at_TLT
Different suspension designs have different motion-ratios. The motion ratio (or leverage ratio) means how many inches does the shock shaft move in relation to the wheel travel. IFS trucks are a linkage type system and they use more leverage to get travel out of a shorter shock than most live axle vehicles. The only live axle vehicles that have an other than 1:1 motion ratio are linked suspensions with the shocks mounted to the links as opposed to being mounted to the axle directly. Then you can decide the motion ratio based on how far up the link the shock is mounted. Any motion ratio under 2:1 is considered acceptable but 1:1 is ideal in terms of damping performance. Our trucks (depending on what shocks are installed) have a motion ratio of about ~1.75:1 FWIW.
You would actually need to decrease the spring rate for a straight axle becasue with a lower motion ratio there is less leverage on the shock. Also the additional weight of the axle itself is unsprung weight so it has zero effect on the sring rate, the springs only suspend the main vehicle's weight (not axles or wheels etc). So where many of us run 550-600# springs on our coil-overs, we could get away with about 350# with a straight axle.
I hope this clears it up for you a little
You would actually need to decrease the spring rate for a straight axle becasue with a lower motion ratio there is less leverage on the shock. Also the additional weight of the axle itself is unsprung weight so it has zero effect on the sring rate, the springs only suspend the main vehicle's weight (not axles or wheels etc). So where many of us run 550-600# springs on our coil-overs, we could get away with about 350# with a straight axle.
I hope this clears it up for you a little
Last edited by 44Runner; 02-10-2005 at 07:53 AM.
#298
You're right, I have 8" SAW's in my truck and they have a heim on both ends as do many of the newer bolt-in coil-over's. I think the 2.0" SAW's are one of the only to not have an upper heim.
#299
Contributing Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 44Runner
You mentioned the most important stuff but while completely correct you left out another obvious draw back. The stock coilover setup does not really have the lateral movement either required of a coilover SA setup, although this would likely not even come into play with the complete lack of travel this setup would have. Regardless the top mount on the IFS coilover is not correct for a SA setup. Stump1883, look at it and then check out the mount on the buggy pics posted. Huge difference...
Now no more hyjacking, back to Steve's material.