Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

What kind of mpg in your 3rd gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 05:31 AM
  #161  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Greg_Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
So your saying your truck gets the same gas milage weather your stop and go, or cruising. I dont see how, especially when nobody else's truck does that. 22 is possible highway, but theres now way your getting 22 in the city. Come on!!!




I believe highway mileage... city, that is impossible..
Old 06-21-2012, 08:31 AM
  #162  
Registered User
 
OJ Simpson 4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
So your saying your truck gets the same gas milage weather your stop and go, or cruising. I dont see how, especially when nobody else's truck does that. 22 is possible highway, but theres now way your getting 22 in the city. Come on!!!
agreed. he would have to be sandbagging the pedal non-stop with the wind on his back in perfect weather conditions and the road is flat with no inclines.

See where I live, the roads have many inclines and declines, I sandbag the crap out of my pedal, i coast as much as possible, I drive -10 under the posted limit on highways and after all that and the mods I did, I struggle to get in the 20s.
Old 06-21-2012, 08:36 AM
  #163  
Registered User
 
OJ Simpson 4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greg_Canada
Now, getting 25.9mpg, from all my testing, is basically impossible unless the roads are 100% flat, no lights, no traffic, speed is around 45-50mph, weather is right (75-80F), A/C off, etc... it's likely because your tires are undersized that you aren't getting the correct measurements.



Agreed



New personal best for me on a pure highway trip, 10.66 L/100km or 22 (US) mpg. very proud of that. Average speed 70mph (indicated).. windows open, A/C off, warm weather (75-80 F), 32psi in the tires.. hilly highway driving, little stop and go traffic. I had my bull bar and roof rack on as well.
My door sticker says our tires are 225 stock ? anyway how big are your tires? Just so I can compare to the 35psi im pumping in mine lol. My gf's pontiac g5 2007? gets 6.4L/100km in city going 70kmh, so jealous.

Also, has anyone driven with ECT PWR on a full tank to see the mpg difference? I've noticed driving with it on, it feels smoother during shifts, instead of the rpm's driving up and down constantly, it raises up to 2000s and stays around there during gear shifting. shouldn't that be better on gas? correct me if im wrong. I always thought that when your RPMs have to drop down and climb up high is what eats your gas away?

Last edited by OJ Simpson 4Runner; 06-21-2012 at 08:39 AM.
Old 06-21-2012, 08:46 AM
  #164  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Greg_Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OJ Simpson 4Runner
My door sticker says our tires are 225 stock ? anyway how big are your tires? Just so I can compare to the 35psi im pumping in mine lol. My gf's pontiac g5 2007? gets 6.4L/100km in city going 70kmh, so jealous.

Also, has anyone driven with ECT PWR on a full tank to see the mpg difference? I've noticed driving with it on, it feels smoother during shifts, instead of the rpm's driving up and down constantly, it raises up to 2000s and stays around there during gear shifting. shouldn't that be better on gas? correct me if im wrong. I always thought that when your RPMs have to drop down and climb up high is what eats your gas away?
I always drive with ECT on... i love manual's and my truck is an auto, and it feels a bit more like manual with it on.. hard to describe, it's not perfect (newer auto's are much better than our 80's tech) but it seems to work better for me. I don't notice a mileage difference between ect on and off.

No, when you say 6.4l/100km city @ 70km/h... that doesn't sound like city driving to me. City driving is 0-50km/h stop and go, red lights, traffic, etc... (maybe i should call is "big city" driving.... ) 70km/h cruising i get great mileage, just when i stop and go it drops.

As for tire size, mine says 265/70r16... 32psi... you may have the base model which comes with the baby sized tires... what is your gear ratio code?
Old 06-21-2012, 08:51 AM
  #165  
Registered User
 
OJ Simpson 4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greg_Canada
I always drive with ECT on... i love manual's and my truck is an auto, and it feels a bit more like manual with it on.. hard to describe, it's not perfect (newer auto's are much better than our 80's tech) but it seems to work better for me. I don't notice a mileage difference between ect on and off.

No, when you say 6.4l/100km city @ 70km/h... that doesn't sound like city driving to me. City driving is 0-50km/h stop and go, red lights, traffic, etc... (maybe i should call is "big city" driving.... ) 70km/h cruising i get great mileage, just when i stop and go it drops.

As for tire size, mine says 265/70r16... 32psi... you may have the base model which comes with the baby sized tires... what is your gear ratio code?
oh, theres a huge road here where its 70km ( with traffic lights ) you basically drive on it to get anywhere on the west side (where i am in the city) the east side is all 50km. I got the oversized 265's but my door definitely says 225. No idea what my gear ratio code is.. lol

And yes ECT definitely feels better than no ECT on!
Old 06-21-2012, 02:16 PM
  #166  
Registered User
 
Adam F's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
14.5

Sucks

Used to get 19-21
Old 06-21-2012, 02:37 PM
  #167  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
aa1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
^^ouch! Have you looked at O2 sensors and whatnot? that is incredibly low mileage for a '96 also...

A blower for certain helps the mpg's even getting on it every so often.
Old 07-03-2012, 08:46 AM
  #168  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
aa1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
filled up a week and a half ago and the whole time driving on that tank, my engine was bogging down and not making full power, incredibly crappy and choppy throughout the RPM's... thought I was finally NEEDING a tune but filled up with gas from Ft Lewis next and not only did it smooth back out to normal but made much more power and went from barely 17 to 19.2 mpg's with the better fuel. Those were both 92 octane also! the first one was a 76 station in Lacey, musta been like 40% ethanol, cripes....

someone probably went pee in the premium tank.... hahahhaa
Old 07-03-2012, 12:52 PM
  #169  
Registered User
 
mcaz5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 SR5 4x4 3.4L with 265/75/16
I average about 16/17 mpgs with about 60% city and 40% highway
Old 10-12-2012, 12:12 PM
  #170  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
paddlenbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just took a trip from sea level and went over two 9,900 foot elevation passes and managed 20.8 MPG. The truck is a TRD supercharged V6 with a 5-speed, sliders, 265/75R16 Load Range D tires, roof rack and loaded with camping gear. After 2 days of wheeling, quite a bit of idling and supercharger use playing around on desert roads, the worst tank I still got 18.9 MPG. I'm pretty happy with that.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:32 PM
  #171  
Registered User
 
ARB1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
19 mpg 265/75R16's auto. MIT, Pro dry S air filter, synthetic in everything.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:23 PM
  #172  
Registered User
 
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Just took a trip from sea level and went over two 9,900 foot elevation passes and managed 20.8 MPG. The truck is a TRD supercharged V6 with a 5-speed, sliders, 265/75R16 Load Range D tires, roof rack and loaded with camping gear. After 2 days of wheeling, quite a bit of idling and supercharger use playing around on desert roads, the worst tank I still got 18.9 MPG. I'm pretty happy with that.
Thats awsome

Also does anyone know why some supercharged 3.4's get better mpgs then non supercharged? Somthing to do with craming more air in all the time? Its not like it adds more fuel with all that air, or anything like that right? Just air? Food for thought.
Old 10-15-2012, 08:05 AM
  #173  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
paddlenbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
Thats awsome

Also does anyone know why some supercharged 3.4's get better mpgs then non supercharged? Somthing to do with craming more air in all the time? Its not like it adds more fuel with all that air, or anything like that right? Just air? Food for thought.
The supercharger doesn't really change the fuel economy unless you're in it all the time. Drive reasonably with a few spirited acceleration runs per tank and you probably won't see the economy drop; that was my experience anyway. But it does seem to get better mileage on long high elevation passes and I think that's because it's not getting worked as hard. On certain grades before the supercharger I was either near wide open throttle in 4th gear or running 4,000 RPMs in 3rd gear to stay at 70 MPH. Now I'm in 4th or 5th gear without being heavy on the throttle.
Old 10-16-2012, 06:56 PM
  #174  
Registered User
 
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The supercharger doesn't really change the fuel economy unless you're in it all the time. Drive reasonably with a few spirited acceleration runs per tank and you probably won't see the economy drop; that was my experience anyway. But it does seem to get better mileage on long high elevation passes and I think that's because it's not getting worked as hard. On certain grades before the supercharger I was either near wide open throttle in 4th gear or running 4,000 RPMs in 3rd gear to stay at 70 MPH. Now I'm in 4th or 5th gear without being heavy on the throttle.

Good explanation on that. It does make sense to that degree. Your results are definetly believable. I could see that kind of mpg from your setup. Its mostly some of the other supercharged guys claiming it gave them an automatic 5mpg better all the time, that I'm referring to with the comment above.
Kind of an if you will, ..
Old 10-21-2012, 10:27 AM
  #175  
Registered User
 
Brad.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295

CHECK THIS OUT:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymake/Toyota2001.shtml

You really made then look dumb. They didn't post their results for how good your economy would be with your engine off coasting down hill.
I also coast down a lot of big hills in neutral.
Old 10-21-2012, 04:21 PM
  #176  
Registered User
 
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I also coast down a lot of big hills in neutral.
Thats neat, to bad your engine doesn't use any fuel in gear and coasting either. So theres no difference in fuel economy. What did think the motors is still injecting fuel when you let off the gas and coast downhill?
Old 10-21-2012, 05:17 PM
  #177  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Greg_Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ThatGuy1295
Thats neat, to bad your engine doesn't use any fuel in gear and coasting either. So theres no difference in fuel economy. What did think the motors is still injecting fuel when you let off the gas and coast downhill?
Sometimes it does... when i watch my scangauge... it either reads about 3L/100km, or 0L/100km when engine braking... don't know why... it seems it doesn't ALWAYS use zero fuel... some times it idles.
It's actually better to leave it in gear when going downhill, as it sometimes shuts the gas off completely....
Old 10-22-2012, 05:38 PM
  #178  
Registered User
 
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Sometimes it does... when i watch my scangauge... it either reads about 3L/100km, or 0L/100km when engine braking... don't know why... it seems it doesn't ALWAYS use zero fuel... some times it idles.
It's actually better to leave it in gear when going downhill, as it sometimes shuts the gas off completely....
__________________
Thats true, its actually using less gas then it does idling while coasting in neutral. Even more reseon why coasting in neutral doesnt help mpg.
Old 12-14-2012, 10:27 PM
  #179  
Registered User
 
CYi5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HB, CA
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14/17 at the moment. It does alright on the highway, but around town it's garbage. Lots of engine noise with little forward motion, I miss my 5 spd taco.

4.88's, 285/75 ATs, front/rear bumpers/sliders/winch. Fair amount of weight I suppose, but still . Maybe dropping to 265/75 with 4.88's will compensate some.

Last edited by CYi5; 12-14-2012 at 10:29 PM.
Old 12-18-2012, 12:26 AM
  #180  
Registered User
 
Dirt Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Antelope Valley, SoCal
Posts: 630
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Greg_Canada
Sometimes it does... when i watch my scangauge... it either reads about 3L/100km, or 0L/100km when engine braking... don't know why... it seems it doesn't ALWAYS use zero fuel... some times it idles.
It's actually better to leave it in gear when going downhill, as it sometimes shuts the gas off completely....
At the minimum there is an RPM set point above which the fuel is cut and a similar one below which the fuel is returned when engine braking. "Coasting" implies that the transmission is in neutral. The manual states that my truck cuts fuel above 1900rpm. It's also known in other circles as "overrun fuel cut."


Quick Reply: What kind of mpg in your 3rd gen?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 AM.