95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

OME 881 / 906 Setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2008 | 10:06 AM
  #21  
gilby4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Dickson,Tennessee
Looking at the same set up! I have the identical runner and i hate that it sits lower than most. Good Job!
Old 05-23-2008 | 10:25 AM
  #22  
hillbilly's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Lat: 40° 47' 01" Long:-78° 00' 58"
Originally Posted by 4biker
I had the exact same results. After driving for a while with the new tires, I've gotten 20mpg at best (highway), and 17.5 (all city) on my last tank, taking it really easy on the skinny pedal. I always seem to be in a hurry while driving my wife's car though.
Originally Posted by 4biker
My understanding is that if you pair the OME springs with the OME (comfort) shocks, it will ride comparably to stock (probably better). I have OME springs with stock shocks, and it's a little stiff for my liking. Stock springs with OME shocks would probably give you a spongy ride (just for comparison). If anyone knows better, please correct me.
Keep in mind that moving up to 265/75 changes your speedo's accuracy slightly as well. Theoretically with 265/75, when your speedo shows 65mph, you're actual speed is likely 66-67mph. So essentially your actual mileage will be somewhat more than what your speedo reflects.
Old 05-23-2008 | 11:34 AM
  #23  
4biker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Originally Posted by hillbilly
Keep in mind that moving up to 265/75 changes your speedo's accuracy slightly as well. Theoretically with 265/75, when your speedo shows 65mph, you're actual speed is likely 66-67mph. So essentially your actual mileage will be somewhat more than what your speedo reflects.
Yeah, I know. My posted mpg's account for that.
Nine years of science in college has to come in handy somewhere.
Old 05-23-2008 | 12:09 PM
  #24  
4biker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, Utah
[hijack]
Sorry about the double post, and Especially sorry about the flagrant thread hijack, but I just ran across this tire size calculator - probably the best I've seen. http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp

Total circumference for a 265/70/16 (notwithstanding the differences in tread depth and casing specs from tire to tire) is 96.2", whereas the circumference for a 265/75/16 is 99.4", making the 75 profile 3.3% greater than the 70. If your speedo is set to the 265/70/16 tire, when it reads 65mph, you will actually be traveling 67.15mph. 75mph translates to 77.48mph.

I thought the difference was more like 5%, but that was just a guess. My speedo is off regardless, so I just put it at or below the speed limit, and I'm usually speeding anyway.

again, 4biker= (and not even the best nerd )
[/hijack]
Old 05-25-2008 | 11:08 AM
  #25  
cocoslow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Here's another tire size calculator that tell you the speedo impact as well as the different dimensions.

http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCal...?action=submit
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kawazx636
The Classifieds GraveYard
34
10-06-2021 04:03 PM
ZGjethro
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
06-08-2017 12:04 AM
A2theK
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
2
10-14-2015 08:10 AM
4runnerFireman
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
09-29-2015 07:24 AM
Keithstoyota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-27-2015 08:29 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.