Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners
View Poll Results: What grade of octane do you use most frequently?
87
110
51.16%
89
41
19.07%
91
34
15.81%
93
30
13.95%
Voters: 215. You may not vote on this poll

octane rating?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2003, 09:45 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
Billrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bayside NY
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 all my vehicles get-why cost and it doesn't run any differently


Dunkin Donuts coffee in me cuz I need the boost.
Old 11-05-2003, 10:06 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
pasteurized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here in Iowa the mid-grade stuff (be it 89, 89.5 or 90, depending on where you go) is the cheapest. It is because of the use of ethanol in the gas, it is cheaper because it gives incentive for farmers and what not to buy their own product and it is cheaper to produce than gas without it. Regardless, i always use mid-grade because it's cheapest :-)
Old 11-05-2003, 12:32 PM
  #63  
Registered User
 
Gbost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Puyallup, WA.
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
__________________________________________________ _

"I generally run 92/93 depending upon what I can get at the station I am at, but I prefer to run 101 or 104 when I am close to home and can get down to the race station"

__________________________________________________ __

Rob what is name of that station and were is it? I am somewhat familiar with the area.
Old 11-05-2003, 01:14 PM
  #64  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's the 76 on Auburn Way, just South of Doxon Toyota. Just look for the big black and white "Trick racing fuel" sign.

The 101 is at the pump closest to the door of the station.
Old 11-05-2003, 01:21 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
Gbost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Puyallup, WA.
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info
Old 11-05-2003, 02:04 PM
  #66  
Contributing Member
 
toy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO, US
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
4Runner: 85, not on your poll...
Truck: 87 or 91 depending on how much cash I have at the time
Old 11-11-2003, 02:39 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
jshuatree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Coloradan drinkin . . . err using 85
Old 11-11-2003, 02:50 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
My99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I agree, unless you're blown, no need for anything over 87 if your truck is in good running order. Been running it since 87 in 1 4Runner and since I just got the 99. I never hear them complain, and I figure the 87 would by now since it's got 250K miles on the original 22RE.

With the old Talon, if I were challenged by a local without any fore-warning, I would grab me a gallon of Xylene (tamed down toulene) and dump it in with a gallon or two of 93 to keep the engine from killing itself at 23psi. But on these n/a understressed motors these toyot'as have, I wouldn't bother spending an extra 20 cents per gallon for nothing.
Old 11-11-2003, 08:01 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
amorphous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenleaf, Ore
Posts: 880
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87

Base line for me....seems to work fine. WHEN I've gone to a higher octane....it didn't make a dif...

a
Old 11-11-2003, 08:24 PM
  #70  
Contributing Member
 
keisur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by My99
I agree, unless you're blown, no need for anything over 87 if your truck is in good running order.
I guess I'm "blown" whatever that means.
Old 11-12-2003, 05:50 PM
  #71  
Contributing Member
 
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think he meant Supercharged "Blown"
Old 11-17-2003, 01:17 PM
  #72  
Contributing Member
 
keisur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Albuquerque Jim
I think he meant Supercharged "Blown"
hehe. I knew that.
Old 11-17-2003, 06:41 PM
  #73  
Contributing Member
 
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hehe. I knew that.
Well, I guess there are other ways to be "Blown"
Old 11-18-2003, 08:06 AM
  #74  
Registered User
 
My99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, I guess there are other ways to be "Blown"
Yup, turbochargers
Old 11-18-2003, 09:23 AM
  #75  
Registered User
 
StingRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Saskatoon,SK Canada
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the book says 87 and you are using it with no ping(detonation) then no performance benefit is going to come from using a higher octane fuel. The Octane rating is the fuels ability to resist pre-detonation of the mixture charge. It in no way reflects the energy available per pound of fuel(BTU's per pound). If the ecu is not programmed to take advantage of a higher octane rating by throwing more timing at the engine up to the knock sensor detecting ping (if so equipped), the timing is not manually altered to take advantage of it, the engine is not Turbo or Supercharged or the compression ratio not increased then in all likleyhood the only thing burning better is money.
Old 11-19-2003, 01:57 AM
  #76  
Contributing Member
 
4runner4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the higher octane does not effect the BTU per pound, why is it that I get more miles out of 95 or 98 than out of 91 octane?
I allways set my trip meter to zero when filling up and I noticed a better fuel economy with the higher octane. That's the main reason why I don't use 91 anymore.
Old 11-19-2003, 05:53 AM
  #77  
Registered User
 
StingRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Saskatoon,SK Canada
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many things affect fuel economy and for example the state of tune of an engine could require a higher octane than normally required for the engine management system to optimize timing to a normal state without ping. Some modern Hi output engines require high octane fuel to obtain full hp output as that is the only way full and optimal timing can be achieved for the particular engine configuration. It is my understanding that the engine in my 98 Runner does NOT fall into such a High output classification and at 3.4 litres and only roughly 180 HP I believe it. I have MK II Supras that are over 150 HP at only 2.8 litres. It is also not to say that any particular fuel could not have more BTU's per pound than another regardless of Octane rating.

Look at it this way. It is understood by most that when lead was removed from fuel it bacame more difficult and expensive to use other additives to increase the Octane ratings of fuel. How many BTU's per pound do figure lead is going to give if you try to light it on fire? Unless you have a reactor and manage to split some atoms then none. Lead was used both to lubricate and improve the Octane rating not to increase the energy content. If you look at a little bottle of 104 Octane booster how many BTU's of energy is stored in there? Better not be enough to actually make a difference in your fuel economy or it's going to have to be stored in bunkers instead of the gas station shelf. Octane rating is strictly a measure of resistance to pre-igniting under heat and pressure (like diesel fuel does). Why you get better fuel conomy is a very good question but octane rating is NOT a rating of energy content. A higher Octane rating will allow you to more efficiently get the Btu's per pound out of the fuel if and only if your engine is in a state of tune that requires it or is configured to take advantage of it.
Old 11-19-2003, 07:05 AM
  #78  
Contributing Member
 
4runner4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe my supra engine has anything to with this. 3.0L en 204 hp.
Old 11-19-2003, 07:22 AM
  #79  
Registered User
 
StingRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Saskatoon,SK Canada
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like you have a N/A MK III car. The 7MGE's knock sensor, twin cams with 4 valves per cylinder and compression ratio can easily squeeze 200 ponies out of 3 litres. The 7MGTE turbo's can be tweaked way into the 700's no problem.

Check out www.monsterhorsepower.com

Reg is a very old friend of mine ( since we were 6) and builds some of the badest Supra's, other Toyota's/Lexus and BMW's around. He personally has a 94 Supra(4th in the One Lap of America a few years back) that is about 1k HP now and has an 82 with a 7MGTE that is up somewhere around 500 HP now. Runners and Cruisers also run in his family and his older brother is a very serious Cruiser guy around here.

Reg's company is in Calgary, AB. Canada and is called RCTS.

Last edited by StingRay; 11-19-2003 at 07:23 AM.
Old 11-19-2003, 07:29 AM
  #80  
Contributing Member
 
4runner4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've added him to my favorites! I'm uppon throwing some cash into the car again. I found a US supra with a 7M-GTE just a few km from my house.
I was allready planning on reaching 300 hp so maybe this is the time.


Quick Reply: octane rating?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM.