Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Toyota 4Runner Steering & Suspension Guides
- Toyota 4Runner 1996-2002: Suspension Performance Diagnostic Guide
Guide to diagnose trouble and recommended solutions.
Browse all: Toyota 4Runner Steering & Suspension Guides
New Suspension Setup - TRD Front Lift for a 3rd Gen 4Runner!
#161
I installed one side and left the other the 4Runner coils with the spacers.
1. The coil alone, even with my tiny little 4cly engine gave me 1.5" of lift. So to say that the engines weight difference matters at all is completely wrong.
2. I used the Daystar studs which are 5cm long and I cut them down to 3.5cm long. Revteks are 3.5cn long.
3. I had to install the Revtek top out to get 2" of lift, even with my light little engine, just go to show you it's really not all that light.
4. The Tundra/Revtek combo is EXACTLY the same as the 4Runner Frankenstein setup. Softness wise, so ANdy and Myself certainly are on the same page.
5. With the Revtek top put and the OME shock, I droop too far. I;m firly certain this is why my axle cage snaped in moab, high tourque and over extended. I will liming strap the front and everything will be fine.
This is the best 3rd Gen front lift BAR NONE.
A. 4WD TRD Tundra Coils
B. Revtek Top Out or Andy's Spacer
C. Daystar studs cut down
D. ARB/OME Heavy Duty front shocks N91S
E. Limiting straps, only if you wheel it hard.
This is cheaper to put together than the Frankenstein setup.
1. The coil alone, even with my tiny little 4cly engine gave me 1.5" of lift. So to say that the engines weight difference matters at all is completely wrong.
2. I used the Daystar studs which are 5cm long and I cut them down to 3.5cm long. Revteks are 3.5cn long.
3. I had to install the Revtek top out to get 2" of lift, even with my light little engine, just go to show you it's really not all that light.
4. The Tundra/Revtek combo is EXACTLY the same as the 4Runner Frankenstein setup. Softness wise, so ANdy and Myself certainly are on the same page.
5. With the Revtek top put and the OME shock, I droop too far. I;m firly certain this is why my axle cage snaped in moab, high tourque and over extended. I will liming strap the front and everything will be fine.
This is the best 3rd Gen front lift BAR NONE.
A. 4WD TRD Tundra Coils
B. Revtek Top Out or Andy's Spacer
C. Daystar studs cut down
D. ARB/OME Heavy Duty front shocks N91S
E. Limiting straps, only if you wheel it hard.
This is cheaper to put together than the Frankenstein setup.
#162
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
I installed one side and left the other the 4Runner coils with the spacers.
1. The coil alone, even with my tiny little 4cly engine gave me 1.5" of lift. So to say that the engines weight difference matters at all is completely wrong.
2. I used the Daystar studs which are 5cm long and I cut them down to 3.5cm long. Revteks are 3.5cn long.
3. I had to install the Revtek top out to get 2" of lift, even with my light little engine, just go to show you it's really not all that light.
4. The Tundra/Revtek combo is EXACTLY the same as the 4Runner Frankenstein setup. Softness wise, so ANdy and Myself certainly are on the same page.
5. With the Revtek top put and the OME shock, I droop too far. I;m firly certain this is why my axle cage snaped in moab, high tourque and over extended. I will liming strap the front and everything will be fine.
This is the best 3rd Gen front lift BAR NONE.
A. 4WD TRD Tundra Coils
B. Revtek Top Out or Andy's Spacer
C. Daystar studs cut down
D. ARB/OME Heavy Duty front shocks N91S
E. Limiting straps, only if you wheel it hard.
This is cheaper to put together than the Frankenstein setup.
1. The coil alone, even with my tiny little 4cly engine gave me 1.5" of lift. So to say that the engines weight difference matters at all is completely wrong.
2. I used the Daystar studs which are 5cm long and I cut them down to 3.5cm long. Revteks are 3.5cn long.
3. I had to install the Revtek top out to get 2" of lift, even with my light little engine, just go to show you it's really not all that light.
4. The Tundra/Revtek combo is EXACTLY the same as the 4Runner Frankenstein setup. Softness wise, so ANdy and Myself certainly are on the same page.
5. With the Revtek top put and the OME shock, I droop too far. I;m firly certain this is why my axle cage snaped in moab, high tourque and over extended. I will liming strap the front and everything will be fine.
This is the best 3rd Gen front lift BAR NONE.
A. 4WD TRD Tundra Coils
B. Revtek Top Out or Andy's Spacer
C. Daystar studs cut down
D. ARB/OME Heavy Duty front shocks N91S
E. Limiting straps, only if you wheel it hard.
This is cheaper to put together than the Frankenstein setup.
#163
Originally Posted by justinh
didn't andy get 2.5" out of this setup?
Yep, I only get 2" even which is fine. Brand New 4WD TRD Coils. Not used stuff.
#164
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
Yeah, I guess. Maybe my engine is heavier. More metal and less belts. ???
Yep, I only get 2" even which is fine. Brand New 4WD TRD Coils. Not used stuff.
Yep, I only get 2" even which is fine. Brand New 4WD TRD Coils. Not used stuff.
Good research, if the Fabtechs bomb for me, this is the route
#165
Originally Posted by Albuquerque Jim
Perhaps the extra weight of your full belly skid, extra T-Case and kick out sliders???
#166
Originally Posted by Albuquerque Jim
Perhaps the extra weight of your full belly skid, extra T-Case and kick out sliders???
Good research, if the Fabtechs bomb for me, this is the route
Good research, if the Fabtechs bomb for me, this is the route
The extra case is aluminum and in the middle of the truck, the rear springs are going to pull 1/2 of that load. Kick out sliders are actually ligher than my old Kongs sliders. Which I never realized were seriously heavy duty.
So I still don't think there is an engine weigth difference.
#167
Originally Posted by Bighead
My concern would be the inevitable break-in settling of the new coil. 2" now with the topout...what will it be in a month or so after some Steve-style wheeling?
OME coils shrink, Toyota-Japaneese coils do not.
#168
Considering I have a 99' V6 and had the same part# springs Steve is currently running, I can say that ALL springs will eventually shrink. Mine lost at least an 1" of ride height from when I first purchased my rig, but the factory springs do retain their ride height longer than aftermarket.
#169
I just installed mine:
Tundar Coils, Rubber isolator, no rev-tek (tried to at first but made it way to difficult to get shock back in (assembly too long).
I ended up right back where i was (maybe even a little higher) with OME 881's, rubber isolater and an in the back 3/4" thick metal spacer with the factory top plate.
I am satisfied we will see if it settles any, driving it back to my parents house from my house on the worst road known to man it seems much softer.
I would attribute my extra height to having no additional front end weight.
Tundar Coils, Rubber isolator, no rev-tek (tried to at first but made it way to difficult to get shock back in (assembly too long).
I ended up right back where i was (maybe even a little higher) with OME 881's, rubber isolater and an in the back 3/4" thick metal spacer with the factory top plate.
I am satisfied we will see if it settles any, driving it back to my parents house from my house on the worst road known to man it seems much softer.
I would attribute my extra height to having no additional front end weight.
#170
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
Those 99 4Runner coils I have run for 10 months are just as tall as the day I put them in and look at what they have been through.
#173
Ok, I have both Tundra coils in. I have a very solid 2" EVEN of lift. It had better not go down and I don't think it will.
But here is something weird, well not so weird, but I have TONS more droop. Turns out the Tundra wraps are in a slightly different spot and they let the ball joint go further down. There is no doubt that I broke that alxe in Moab due to too much droop past what it could handle.
Needles to say, the Tundra coils with out spacers ARE softer than the 4Runner coils with the 1.5" Cornbred spacers. So the Tundra coils are the bomb. I am going to have to use liming straps to chill the droop.
Another thing is I re-measured my old 18" straps and with weather they shrunk to 17". So they were holding my rear back in Moab May 2004. Now I have 19" with the top mount moved up 1/2" so they are like 18.5" and are perfect.
Now I have to strap the front and then I can really hammer it hard.
By the way the Tundra TRD coils I bought are not progressive, all the wraps are evenly spaced. The Tacoma coils are the progressive ones, NOT the Tundra.
But here is something weird, well not so weird, but I have TONS more droop. Turns out the Tundra wraps are in a slightly different spot and they let the ball joint go further down. There is no doubt that I broke that alxe in Moab due to too much droop past what it could handle.
Needles to say, the Tundra coils with out spacers ARE softer than the 4Runner coils with the 1.5" Cornbred spacers. So the Tundra coils are the bomb. I am going to have to use liming straps to chill the droop.
Another thing is I re-measured my old 18" straps and with weather they shrunk to 17". So they were holding my rear back in Moab May 2004. Now I have 19" with the top mount moved up 1/2" so they are like 18.5" and are perfect.
Now I have to strap the front and then I can really hammer it hard.
By the way the Tundra TRD coils I bought are not progressive, all the wraps are evenly spaced. The Tacoma coils are the progressive ones, NOT the Tundra.
Last edited by sschaefer3; 10-24-2004 at 08:53 PM.
#174
Sweet... I was guessing that I was at about 2.25", but I went from stock setup to stock w/ cornfed 1", to Tundra w/ 2.5" cornfed, to this. I was 1/4" lower than the regular Tundra coils and the 2.5" spacer after I added the winch and SC. I assumed that I was getting a full 2.25" to begin with (with spacers) - and it looks like I'm pretty close...
As I said before, the difference b/w the 4cyl and the 6cly (both 4wd) should be no more than 150#. That's about 3/8" ride height difference AT MOST.
My next thing on my to-do list is to go measure a 99 or 00 Limited 4wd runner and get the hub/fender measurement so I know how much lift I got compared to stock.
The material arrived at the CNC shop on Friday. Hopefully the spacers will get cut today or tomorrow and be in my hands later this week.
As I said before, the difference b/w the 4cyl and the 6cly (both 4wd) should be no more than 150#. That's about 3/8" ride height difference AT MOST.
My next thing on my to-do list is to go measure a 99 or 00 Limited 4wd runner and get the hub/fender measurement so I know how much lift I got compared to stock.
The material arrived at the CNC shop on Friday. Hopefully the spacers will get cut today or tomorrow and be in my hands later this week.
Last edited by bamachem; 10-25-2004 at 07:33 AM.
#176
Originally Posted by FilthyRich
Steve, are you going to use the3/8" spacer? Or would it be too much lift? Would adding the spacer on a v-6 still be the way to go with the Tundra springs?
Yes, you will need the spacer no matter what engine you have.
#178
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
Ok, I have both Tundra coils in. I have a very solid 2" EVEN of lift. It had better not go down and I don't think it will.
But here is something weird, well not so weird, but I have TONS more droop. Turns out the Tundra wraps are in a slightly different spot and they let the ball joint go further down. There is no doubt that I broke that alxe in Moab due to too much droop past what it could handle.
Needles to say, the Tundra coils with out spacers ARE softer than the 4Runner coils with the 1.5" Cornbred spacers. So the Tundra coils are the bomb. I am going to have to use liming straps to chill the droop.
Another thing is I re-measured my old 18" straps and with weather they shrunk to 17". So they were holding my rear back in Moab May 2004. Now I have 19" with the top mount moved up 1/2" so they are like 18.5" and are perfect.
Now I have to strap the front and then I can really hammer it hard.
By the way the Tundra TRD coils I bought are not progressive, all the wraps are evenly spaced. The Tacoma coils are the progressive ones, NOT the Tundra.
But here is something weird, well not so weird, but I have TONS more droop. Turns out the Tundra wraps are in a slightly different spot and they let the ball joint go further down. There is no doubt that I broke that alxe in Moab due to too much droop past what it could handle.
Needles to say, the Tundra coils with out spacers ARE softer than the 4Runner coils with the 1.5" Cornbred spacers. So the Tundra coils are the bomb. I am going to have to use liming straps to chill the droop.
Another thing is I re-measured my old 18" straps and with weather they shrunk to 17". So they were holding my rear back in Moab May 2004. Now I have 19" with the top mount moved up 1/2" so they are like 18.5" and are perfect.
Now I have to strap the front and then I can really hammer it hard.
By the way the Tundra TRD coils I bought are not progressive, all the wraps are evenly spaced. The Tacoma coils are the progressive ones, NOT the Tundra.
#179
I ordered the adjustable front limiting straps. $115.00 for all the parts and I weld it on.
I think we need to find out WHY I droop so far and Andy does not. I am willing to bet the Bilstein shock is a bit shorter at full extension. Which would hold the droop back. Also maybe the ATS arms actually do give you more droop.
???
I think we need to find out WHY I droop so far and Andy does not. I am willing to bet the Bilstein shock is a bit shorter at full extension. Which would hold the droop back. Also maybe the ATS arms actually do give you more droop.
???
#180
Originally Posted by mtxride
do you think that your aftermarket upper control arms are also contributing to having too much droop? I'm wondering if it will be neccesary to use limit straps with your setup but with stock control arms.