95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

highway drive with 5.29 and 315s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2007 | 02:16 PM
  #1  
caffecapri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
highway drive with 5.29 and 315s

Just looking at used 4Runners...my wife has a 99 since new and it's been a great vehicle. I'd like a 4x4 and am looking at used vehicles and had gearing questions.

With 315s and 5.29s, are there any downfalls in highway road trips? Have been searching these forums, but not quite sure of what real world experience people are getting. Any info and experience would be great. Power, issues, tranny temps, weakness...all things I would like to know. Thank you.
Old 11-23-2007 | 04:49 PM
  #2  
d0ubledown's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: vansterdam BC.
ive got 315's but 4.88's and not 5.29's.

at an indicated 100 km/h, tach is reading about 2250. at an indicated 120 km/h, its at 2500. with 5.29's you'll be at about 2500/2750 respectively.

this is with the 5VZ-FE with autobox.

at highway speeds, i dont like being over 2500 for a longer than needed period of time. with the 5.29's..sure you'll get more passing power, but i find it too buzzy. you'll also burn more petrol at higher speeds...

definitely want to do at least 4.88's. and a tranny cooler. i've got one, but havent installed it yet...and no tranny issues so far. i think the oem tranny cooler does a good enough job. may want to add a power steering cooler as well...
Old 11-23-2007 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
Man4God's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
I am not convinced that lower RPMs yield better fuel efficiency. I experienced this with my Cobra. The faster I went, the better mileage I got.

However, gearing to match the tires will do wonders for the transmission (no additional cooling needed) and fuel mileage.
Old 11-23-2007 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
yotasavg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Chico Republic, NOR*CAL
Originally Posted by Man4God
The faster I went, the better mileage I got.
my friends and family say i'm retarded, but i'll agree with that.
Old 11-23-2007 | 06:55 PM
  #5  
toyotaordie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Richmond Indiana
Not sure how the 315's compare to 35's but i have 35 inch bfg mud tires on my 86 toyotA 4runner with 5.29's and a truetrac locker in the front and a 4inch lift. at 70 mph the tach reads 3000 but as for everyday driving i get about 18mpg. not the greatest as far as a yota but definilty better than the 10 mpg on my chevy.... So far no problems I have only owned the truck 3 years it is my daily driver/wheeler


hope this helps somehow

sean
Old 11-23-2007 | 06:58 PM
  #6  
Man4God's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by yotasavg
my friends and family say i'm retarded, but i'll agree with that.
With stock gearing on my Cobra (3.27s) I would get 20 MPG at 70 MPH. Now, when I spent a half tank at over 100 MPH in New Mexico on a long trip, I got 28 MPG.

There is a sweet spot in an engine's power band. Gearing helps you keep that sweet spot always attainable.
Old 11-23-2007 | 09:49 PM
  #7  
txrunyota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Man4God
With stock gearing on my Cobra (3.27s) I would get 20 MPG at 70 miles per hour. Now, when I spent a half tank at over 100 miles per hour in New Mexico on a long trip, I got 28 MPG.

There is a sweet spot in an engine's power band. Gearing helps you keep that sweet spot always attainable.


Did the same thing in my 99 Cobra. Stock 3.27 gears would get about 22mpg at 75mph, and it once got 27mpg going 85-90mph.

Last edited by txrunyota; 11-23-2007 at 09:51 PM.
Old 11-23-2007 | 09:53 PM
  #8  
mikes19984x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Originally Posted by d0ubledown
ive got 315's but 4.88's and not 5.29's.

at an indicated 100 km/h, tach is reading about 2250. at an indicated 120 km/h, its at 2500. with 5.29's you'll be at about 2500/2750 respectively.

this is with the 5VZ-FE with autobox.

at highway speeds, i dont like being over 2500 for a longer than needed period of time. with the 5.29's..sure you'll get more passing power, but i find it too buzzy. you'll also burn more petrol at higher speeds...

definitely want to do at least 4.88's. and a tranny cooler. i've got one, but havent installed it yet...and no tranny issues so far. i think the oem tranny cooler does a good enough job. may want to add a power steering cooler as well...

haha, well on the 3.4s with the 5-speed, you have to run over 2500 if you want to at least run 70 on the interstate!!! and i actually get my best mileage running at 80 mph, which is exactly 3000 rpm, and it got me 22.6 mpg on my last 220 mile trip home!
Old 11-24-2007 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
Fo-runna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Virginia
I agree with getting better mileage at higher speeds. I hardly have to touch the pedal to maintain 80ish in my 4-runner where at 65, especially with hills, I'm a lot deeper on the pedal. Obviously it has something to do with powerband, gearing, etc, etc.
I just got 20mpg with my 285's and stock gears on a trip this Thanksgiving. I was averaging around 75 mph. I can't complain about 20mpg with 33's.
As far as 5.29 & 315's... I think you will be running pretty close to factory gearing with that set up.
Old 11-24-2007 | 11:08 AM
  #10  
caffecapri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Thanks for the responses everyone. My main concern was not being able to get into overdrive (auto) with this setup (on a 3.4). From the sounds of things, should be very close to stock-like I think?
Old 11-24-2007 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
d0ubledown's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: vansterdam BC.
all stock, i can see how running higher speeds will net you better mpg. but add substantially larger and heavier tires, a less than ideal coefficient of drag from lift/bigger tires/big heavy bumper, then you WILL use more fuel trying to turn those bigger, heavier tires at the same speed than stock. its simple physics.

with proper gearing, it (torque curve) should be near stock. however, it wont feel like stock acceleration/cruise since a 35" tire has much more rotational mass than a stock 30 or 31" tire. you'll be able to get into overdrive once you've hit a constant speed...assuming the TPS (and everything else that controls engine/fuel management) deems its ok to do so...
Old 11-24-2007 | 09:14 PM
  #12  
aviator31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Centerton,AR
Originally Posted by txrunyota
Did the same thing in my 99 Cobra. Stock 3.27 gears would get about 22mpg at 75mph, and it once got 27mpg going 85-90mph.
That would be a cool excuse to use with the Highway Patrol, "officer, I swear, I just get a lot better gas mileage at 100mph."
Old 11-24-2007 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
ARB1977's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
Originally Posted by mikes19984x4
haha, well on the 3.4s with the 5-speed, you have to run over 2500 if you want to at least run 70 on the interstate!!! and i actually get my best mileage running at 80 miles per hour, which is exactly 3000 rpm, and it got me 22.6 mpg on my last 220 mile trip home!
With my 265/75's at 70 mph im alittle over 2000 rpm...maybe becasue i have an auto.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
07-14-2020 09:35 PM
Liadrin
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-01-2015 07:44 AM
Yotadawgjr
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
08-23-2015 11:51 AM
kyletbert
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
07-17-2015 12:39 PM
Sandman
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
07-14-2015 01:36 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.