95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners
View Poll Results: Help with tire selection for East Coast wheeling (35's)
BFG KM Mud Terrains
19
59.38%
Goodyear MTR's
13
40.63%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Help with tire selection for East Coast wheeling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2005 | 08:04 AM
  #1  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Help with tire selection for East Coast wheeling

Not another tire thread!!!

OK - I'm at a crossroads on tire selection. Somehow, MTR pricing has gotten more reasonable making the spread between BFG Mud TA's and MTRs negligible. This is for 35's. These will be used mostly in mud and some amount of rocks on the East Coast on my locked and geared 4Runner. I had a set of BFG Mud's already and liked them - I've heard that MTR's aren't all that great in the mud.

Weigh in on your selection - BETWEEN THESE TWO ONLY PLEASE!!!

Last edited by Cebby; 09-08-2005 at 08:17 AM.
Old 09-08-2005 | 08:09 AM
  #2  
FilthyRich's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
Originally Posted by Cebby
Not another tire thread!!!

OK - I'm at a crossroads on tire selection. Somehow, MTR pricing has gotten more reasonable making the spread between BFG Mud TA's and MTRs negligible. This is for 35's. These will be used mostly in mud and some amount of rocks on the East Coast on my locked and geared 4Runner. I had a set of BFG Mud's already and liked them - I've heard that MTR's aren't all that great in the mud.

Weigh in on your selection.
I love my MT/R's I have had BFG MT and liked them too. However, I believe the MT/R has a stronger sidewall. For that reason I would go with Goodyear. PLus (at least at www.tires.com) the MT/Rs are cheaper. Two reason to run them over the BFG
Old 09-08-2005 | 08:14 AM
  #3  
TRunner's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Yokohamas... ;-)
Old 09-08-2005 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
Intrepid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: Ashburnham, MA
Have you considered a TrXus MT? They are siped and have a beefy sidewall and are at least as aggressive as those two. (sidewall is 2 ply but rated as tough at a 6 ply)





http://www.off-road.com/jeep/cheroke...rco-trxus.html

Otherwise I think my vote goes to the BFG but you may consider getting it siped for winter driving and rain.
Old 09-08-2005 | 08:49 AM
  #5  
seaflea's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 1
From: wilmington nc
I voted for BFGs!
Old 09-08-2005 | 09:10 AM
  #6  
AznSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
I voted for BFG Muds also, cuz from friends telling me, MT/R's do suck in the mud.

And also recommend getting them siped for winter driving.

Last edited by AznSky; 09-08-2005 at 09:13 AM.
Old 09-08-2005 | 09:15 AM
  #7  
Sporin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, VT U.S.A.
I second the TrXus... better in the snow too thanks to the siping.

I know a LOT of guys who run the TrXus and not a singel one is disapointed. Perfect for wet, leafy, rocky, muddy, east coast wheeling.
Old 09-08-2005 | 10:07 AM
  #8  
dwh91102's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, Indiana
I know cebby, kumho's aren't a choice, but they should be imo. Heres a article on them
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/products/kumho/index2.html


EDIT: I just bought a set of these 31x10.5x15, I've had them off road for about 100 mi's and on road for about 1k, and theres not 1 thing I can say bad about them. I got them at tire discounters for $610 total after taxes including alignment. thats compared to nearly $800 for the bfg

Last edited by dwh91102; 09-08-2005 at 10:10 AM.
Old 09-08-2005 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
mt/r's
Old 09-08-2005 | 02:39 PM
  #10  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
bump..

86 views and only 9 votes?
Old 09-08-2005 | 02:47 PM
  #11  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
I would not run an MT/R where I saw regular mud.

I have MT/R's and they are not worth darn in mud, but that is not what they were made for. They are a rock tire. Pure, dry rock.

Maximum Traction Reinforced. Not Mud Tire Retards
Old 09-08-2005 | 03:53 PM
  #12  
Silver_Truck's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
From: B'ham, WA
bfgs are my vote
Old 09-08-2005 | 04:57 PM
  #13  
Ironmike4x4's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 1
From: Upsate SC
I vote BFGs. I am a little biased since I have run them before and not the MTRs but I was very impressed with the BFGs when I had them. My only problem with them was they were loud, but it's a mud tire not a street terrain. They did fairly well on wet traction, at least better than my current ATs so it's a plus.
Old 09-08-2005 | 05:05 PM
  #14  
ORB's Avatar
ORB
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Can't speak for the mt/r's but I love my bfg mud's!! Seems fine to me in the rain, not too loud on the road, awesome in mud...
Old 09-08-2005 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
dragr1's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 1
From: Auburn, AL
I voted BFG b/c you said mud use, if it were mostly for rocks then I would go MTR.
Old 09-09-2005 | 06:05 PM
  #16  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Looks like a win for the KM's (landslide)

I polled 3 boards. Here are the results:

KM - 25 votes
MTR - 10 votes
Other - 9 votes

That's a good thing actually, since I have one already. (I feel better )
Old 09-09-2005 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
Scofco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,587
Likes: 0
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
I voted BFG.
I've turned mine into slicks on several occassions, but they always did a hell of a job cleaning themselves.
Old 09-09-2005 | 06:17 PM
  #18  
Gangus2006's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: Fitchburg, MA
How bout Toyo MTs? They come siped.
Old 09-09-2005 | 06:19 PM
  #19  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Gangus2006
How bout Toyo MTs? They come siped.
Too wide.
Old 09-10-2005 | 10:36 AM
  #20  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
I've had one set on BFGs, wore out WAY too quick. My vote is MT/Rs

Get your prices from www.tirerack.com or discounttiredirect and your local SEARS will price match and cut them price by 10% more.



I got 37" MT/Rs for less than $170/each...beat that...and picked them pu the next day!




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 AM.