95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

4x4 2005 Tacoma?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2004 | 11:27 AM
  #81  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
Originally Posted by LarsDennert
The new Tacoma will share the 8" IFS diff from the '03 4Runner. Seems like they could use the '03 rear axle housing that has disk brakes too. Whoops, scratch that. They wouldn't go backwards on diff strength for the rear end... Maybe they'll create another housing for the Taco pumkin with disk brakes. That would mean no elocker though since the elocker housing only sports drums. It would be silly to have drums on the TRD version and disks on the regular version....
i think it would be rather trivial to modify the housing to accept disk brakes. seems to me like the tacoma is becoming less of a workhorse and more of an image thing, as most other small trucks have become in the last 10 years
Old 04-13-2004 | 12:08 PM
  #82  
outahere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by EnolaGaia
FWIW... I've been monitoring the NY Auto Show stuff at multiple forums and sites. There's been absolutely no mention of any Taco being displayed other than the X-Runner unveiled at Chicago in February. I've even posted a couple of inquiries at NY show-specific bulletin boards, but no one's bothered to respond at all. I'm starting to wonder if Toyota is really gonna unveil the 'normal' (non-X) '05 Taco in NY.
I'm wondering too. Bummer! Maybe Toyota is holding off on showing this 4x4 truck so they don't kill sales of the 2004 model.
Old 04-13-2004 | 12:13 PM
  #83  
outahere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
seems to me like the tacoma is becoming less of a workhorse and more of an image thing, as most other small trucks have become in the last 10 years
LOL, this is even more true for the "full size" trucks! I bet the majority of the huge, full size 4 door crew cab pickups haul nothing heavier than 6 bags of groceries or 2 sheets of plywood. It's all about having an intimidating image.
Old 04-13-2004 | 12:30 PM
  #84  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Colorado
Uh, well. When was the Tacoma ever considered a workhorse? The frame is too flexible to haul anything of size, along with no floating axle and a non-fully boxed frame.

I would say that the majority of private truck owners, including myself, just like the flexiblity of having a bed incase you ever need it.
Old 04-13-2004 | 08:29 PM
  #85  
FirstToy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Good news is that the 05 Taco does have fully boxed frame rails, more crossmembers and is obviously bigger than the current Taco.

It will certainly be able to be more of a worktruck if that is your requirement. I would think the size would not be ideal for off roading but it seems to fit the bill of a worktruck.
Old 04-26-2004 | 08:04 AM
  #86  
HKINGS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Exclamation Found the Spy Shots!

Hey guys! First time poster here. I think I found those spy shots First Toy was talking about!

Go ahead and go straight to this link!

Looks pretty sweet! Enjoy!

http://www.thecarconnection.com/inde...&sid=178&n=158

Old 04-26-2004 | 08:10 AM
  #87  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
wow i was just coming to this thread to post that very same link.

for those who just wanna see the pics:


Old 04-26-2004 | 08:55 AM
  #88  
tenfourtyeight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Vista, Ca
That is ugly. I hate the fenders. They remind me of the new Chevy Cheyanne or whatever it is. Why do they make all new vehicles look like spaceships?
Old 04-26-2004 | 09:06 AM
  #89  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
where's my single cab?
Old 04-26-2004 | 09:28 AM
  #90  
Good Times's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,690
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Have you guys seen the Chev Colorado? It sure looks similar to the new 05 Taco designs...


Old 04-26-2004 | 09:29 AM
  #91  
Schuey2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
where's my single cab?
.. and my longbed??

(It would be as bad lookin' if it didn't have those fender flare lookin' jobbies.!)

Old 04-26-2004 | 09:40 AM
  #92  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
i might be alone, but i like it.

i dont like those rims thatre carried over from the runner -- i think the 'diamond cut' thing on them is really tacky.
Old 04-26-2004 | 09:44 AM
  #93  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Colorado
oh man, those fenders are worse then the 4th Gen 4Runners. I don't understand the need to go angular.
Old 04-26-2004 | 10:04 AM
  #94  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
Yea those are ugly rims, but that is fixable. I don't like those wheel wells. I've seen the Colorado in person and the wheel wells are ugly. The Tacoma looks to have the exact shape. Eventually all cars/trucks will look alike I guess. We still can't see the front. Doesn't look too bad, but the wheel wells kill it. Did they think the white color in the winter would make it camoflage?
Old 04-26-2004 | 10:06 AM
  #95  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
the colorado wouldn't be too bad of a truck if it didn't have those ugly "inward" fender flares on the bed. just looks cheap. and angular wheel wells do indeed suck.
Old 04-26-2004 | 10:39 AM
  #96  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
the big difference is that one is a chevy, the other is a toyota. id always buy the toyota over the chevy.

but yea, youre right, its a bit disheartening to see how similar the two are in shape.
Old 04-26-2004 | 10:52 AM
  #97  
Pretacopower's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Originally Posted by lee
wow i was just coming to this thread to post that very same link.

for those who just wanna see the pics:


:cry:

I cant find anymore negative smiles to describe my feelings for that thing
Old 04-26-2004 | 11:01 AM
  #98  
Good Times's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,690
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by lee
the big difference is that one is a chevy, the other is a toyota. id always buy the toyota over the chevy.

but yea, youre right, its a bit disheartening to see how similar the two are in shape.
Don't forget Toyota already works w/ GM selling the Matrix/Vibe, Corolla/Prism. I just hope that the new taco isn't gonna have a twin Colorado... And if it is, atleast we know what it will somewhat look like since those are already on the road.
Old 04-26-2004 | 02:47 PM
  #99  
outahere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
The white Double Cab is not very photogenic, is it. The cab seems a little short in height, looks like it has had a chop job on it. Hopefully it will look better in the flesh.
Old 04-26-2004 | 02:57 PM
  #100  
redvet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: NE NJ
I like the 4.0L but may have to look for a '04 Lunar Mist with TRD and chrome package.
Not impressed with the generic '05 GM look.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 PM.