95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

4.7 swap on 2nd gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2004 | 08:56 AM
  #21  
JDeMello's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally posted by BruceTS
When I was doing a search for a replacement engine for my 4runner, I saw a bunch of Hilux diesel engines and was seriously thinking about putting one of them in my ride..

The swap can be done, it just may take a bit of serious work to make it fit, not to mention the rewiring needed.
When You do that swap can I have your V6
Old 01-21-2004 | 08:57 AM
  #22  
JDeMello's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Re: 4.7 swap on 2nd gen?

Originally posted by NRM
so has anyone attempted this? is it feasible? i didn't know whether the new 4.7 V8 would even fit in the 2nd gen. engine bay. i don't have the money now, but in the next couple years i am looking to put a bigger engine in. i love my '95 runner but its just so underpowered. so can it be done?
I want to know how hard a 4.7 swap into a 99 tacoma would be? I want a S\C but with a 4.7 I wouldn't need it Or I could get the 4.7 v8

Jason
Old 01-21-2004 | 10:15 AM
  #23  
Sac State's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, North Carolina
An innocent question...

Why spend all the time, money and aggravation of trying to shove a 4.7 in your 2 or 3rd generation? In two years the '03 4th generations will have depreciated enough to buy a new rig with the 4.7 stock.

Old 01-21-2004 | 10:22 AM
  #24  
Sac State's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, North Carolina
Originally posted by Del
Doesn't a supercharged 3.4 make more power than the
V8?
V8 has much more low end grunt. The peak hp band for the V8 is in the 2-4000 rpm range, the boosted 3.4 has its hp band much higher in the rpm zone. Plus the 5spd auto shifts at the right points and keeps the motor spooled.

I didn't have a S/C on my 3.4, but comparing the non S/C 3.4 to the 4.7 is like comparing apples to oranges. The 4.7 reminds me of an old Z28 I had in high school. This engine/tranny combo rocks!
Old 01-21-2004 | 10:25 AM
  #25  
Pretacopower's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Originally posted by Sac State
An innocent question...

Why spend all the time, money and aggravation of trying to shove a 4.7 in your 2 or 3rd generation? In two years the '03 4th generations will have depreciated enough to buy a new rig with the 4.7 stock.

Just rain on the parade why dont you.
Old 01-21-2004 | 10:54 AM
  #26  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by Sac State
An innocent question...

Why spend all the time, money and aggravation of trying to shove a 4.7 in your 2 or 3rd generation? In two years the '03 4th generations will have depreciated enough to buy a new rig with the 4.7 stock.

Gee, I dunno - let's see...
[list=1][*]Paid for long ago[*]Inexpensive to SAS[*]Alot of mods done that I'd have to do all over again[*]I won't cry if I scratch it[*]Lots of aftermarket parts available[*]I won't cry if I dent it[*]Paid for long ago[*]I won't cry if I cut some of the body for clearance[*]I prefer the old school look of 2nd and 3rd Gen 4Runners[*]It's got character[*]Cuz no one's jammed a Toy V8 in one (that I know of)[*]Did I mention it's paid for?[/list=1]

In a couple of years a 2003 will be 4 years old. Have you priced used 4Runners? They don't really depreciate all that much very quickly. Personally, I can't see sinking mid-$20's and quickly dumping more into it for mods.

I bought my 93 back in 95 for like $22K. It has taken me 8+ years to do the mods I have. Granted, they've happened alot more quickly now that I'm on YT alot.

All bets are off though if I start crapping money...
Old 01-21-2004 | 11:37 AM
  #27  
Sac State's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, North Carolina
Originally posted by Cebby
Gee, I dunno - let's see...
[list=1][*]Paid for long ago
[*]Did I mention it's paid for?[/list=1]

Ok, what dream are you in? Your telling me that a ten year old vehicle runs without major maintenance or repair? Wow! No repair bills (Big $$ tranny, motor, etc.).

To replace and fabricate the 4.7 w/5spd tranny will cost you prolly $10K into a 2gen. Add up the other repair bills for a ten year old vehicle and $20K isn't much. Not to mention the fabrication needed for the transfer case, etc.

But if you are into maintaining your rig (all aspects) and driving them until the wheels fall or rust off, spend away.
Old 01-21-2004 | 12:10 PM
  #28  
NRM's Avatar
NRM
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
As Cebby said, the whole reason i started this thread is because i love my 2nd gen. and wouldn't think about trading for a 4th gen. my only complaint is the lack of power. i was just curious about a 4.7 swap but obviously the 3.4 swap is much more practical. i personally don't like the 4th gen. model at all compared to the older models and plus the process of working on it and modifying it is half the fun!
Old 01-21-2004 | 12:54 PM
  #29  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
Here we go with 2nd/3rd gen vs 4th gen.

I also would rather have a 2nd or 3rd gen than a 4th gen. I like their size and look. Not a huge ass vehicle. I'm not saying I don't like the 4th gen. It would be my first choice if buying a newer suv.
And yes, my 10 yr old vehicle runs and is in great condition without ANY repairs, rust, etc. Maintenance is a given for any car. I think the biggest cost would be the engine. When I was in high school we used to do all kinds of engine swaps to cars. We would fabricate everything needed. This was half the fun.
Oh and by the way did I mention a lot more ground clearance on 2nd gens compared to 4th gens. I compare everyday as my parnter at work has a 4th gen.
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:13 PM
  #30  
Los Gatos?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: b
Originally posted by ldivinag
depends where you want the power.

with the v8, it's probably low end... with the SC, well you know where they start boostin'...

for me, with a dual crawler, i would go for the 3.4l with the SC. since it is easier and i have half of the drivetrain already for my 90.

remember that the v8 is longer so firewall and radiator will be part of the issues to overcome...

but as someone said, nothing that $$$ cant fix...


V8s are not very long, chief. Think about it...it's 2 banks of 4 cylinders each....hmm sounds roughly the same length as an inline 4...didn't some 4runners come with an inline 4 for a few years? The cylinder displacement is roughly double the 22RE
Old 01-21-2004 | 03:55 PM
  #31  
ldivinag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally posted by Los Gatos?
V8s are not very long, chief. Think about it...it's 2 banks of 4 cylinders each....hmm sounds roughly the same length as an inline 4...didn't some 4runners come with an inline 4 for a few years? The cylinder displacement is roughly double the 22RE
a coworker has a 04 4runner...

dont remember if he has the v8 or v6. i'll measure his front (rad) to firewall distance and compare with my 90...
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:13 PM
  #32  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by Sac State
Ok, what dream are you in? Your telling me that a ten year old vehicle runs without major maintenance or repair? Wow! No repair bills (Big $$ tranny, motor, etc.).

To replace and fabricate the 4.7 w/5spd tranny will cost you prolly $10K into a 2gen. Add up the other repair bills for a ten year old vehicle and $20K isn't much. Not to mention the fabrication needed for the transfer case, etc.

But if you are into maintaining your rig (all aspects) and driving them until the wheels fall or rust off, spend away.
Geez, McFly, haven't you learned anything coming to Yotatech?

If it was a money pit, I'd never have kept it, but the only things that have needed to be replaced are the brakes, tires, exhaust (got stainless now) and the rear window regulator/motor. Last year was the first time I had a little body rust to be repaired. I think that is why I'm so attached to it. It hasn't hit me with a big repair bill. None of my Toyotas have.

I have 125K miles now. I'm hoping for no major issues until well over 200K miles. Time will tell.

As for $10K for the swap, if that's the case, I'd never do it. I'm having a little problem coming up with $10K though. Engine Tranny Transfercase can be had in my area for about $3500. Maybe another $200 for the ECU. I'd do the work myself. By the way, I have an auto now and would stick with that. Even if it's another $1000 in misc. parts, it would be like a new vehicle (to me anyway) for the cost of the swap.

I've leased cars and trucks of various makes, but I always buy Toyotas so I can keep them for a long time. Having the latest and greatest doesn't do it for me anymore.
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:15 PM
  #33  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by Los Gatos?
V8s are not very long, chief. Think about it...it's 2 banks of 4 cylinders each....hmm sounds roughly the same length as an inline 4...didn't some 4runners come with an inline 4 for a few years? The cylinder displacement is roughly double the 22RE
If people are installing Inline 6 Supra motors and Chevy V8's, the Toy one "should" fit just fine.
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:18 PM
  #34  
justinh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 1
From: woodstock, ga
the biggest problem you will run into with the toy v8 is width, being a DOHC v8 is going to cause problems more than likely. GM v8's are pushrods and slightly narrower. I am sure that it can be done, but it will probably require an SAS and reworking the front frame rails and inner fenders.
Old 01-21-2004 | 05:01 PM
  #35  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by justinh
the biggest problem you will run into with the toy v8 is width, being a DOHC v8 is going to cause problems more than likely. GM v8's are pushrods and slightly narrower. I am sure that it can be done, but it will probably require an SAS and reworking the front frame rails and inner fenders.
I've posted a couple of times asking for dimensions on these motors. No one ever responds.

The DOHC width thing makes sense, although the bottom of the motor shouldn't be alot bigger, just the heads, etc. Inner fender reworking = OK - frame rail reworking = BAD. I thought I read that it can be done with IFS. Maybe not.

If only we could get some dimensions. Hey, aren't there some guys that work for Toyota on here???
Old 01-21-2004 | 07:04 PM
  #36  
ldivinag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: N37 39* W122 3*
well, did some measuring on the coworker's 03.

unfortunately he has a v6.

i'll compare the measurements to my 90 and see if the dimensions are the same.
Old 01-21-2004 | 07:13 PM
  #37  
justinh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 1
From: woodstock, ga
the good news is that since tundra's are available with the same motor we have all the components should be available to make a swap work.
Old 01-21-2004 | 09:07 PM
  #38  
JDeMello's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally posted by Sac State
An innocent question...

Why spend all the time, money and aggravation of trying to shove a 4.7 in your 2 or 3rd generation? In two years the '03 4th generations will have depreciated enough to buy a new rig with the 4.7 stock.

Because I feel that the Tacoma will most likely be the last tacoma with a rear locker and a compact truck. Something that is great on the trail. I'm pretty sure the tacoma will be my last truck. and when the motor gets tired I want something with more torq. I also don't want to start all over putting dents on a new truck. If mine gets wrecked I will most likely buy a used one.

I have always been the guy to go with the smaller motor. But When I go wheelin I tow a tent trailer and the 3.4v6 with 4:88's and 35's And it tows fine. But hit the hills or put a quad or some weight in the rear and it gets little slugish.

We had a tundra and I loved the effortless power of the 4.7. It had a great power curve.

Things may change but I'm starting to lean towards a 4.7 swap.
Old 01-22-2004 | 09:42 AM
  #39  
Los Gatos?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: b
Originally posted by Cebby
I've posted a couple of times asking for dimensions on these motors. No one ever responds.

The DOHC width thing makes sense, although the bottom of the motor shouldn't be alot bigger, just the heads, etc. Inner fender reworking = OK - frame rail reworking = BAD. I thought I read that it can be done with IFS. Maybe not.

If only we could get some dimensions. Hey, aren't there some guys that work for Toyota on here???


The 3.4L is more compact than the 3.0, and it has an extra cam and .4L displacement, so isn't it possible the 4.7L isn't much bigger than the 3.0L? I don't think it's bigger than a 302/350 V8.
Old 03-02-2004 | 08:37 PM
  #40  
Designsbyme's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth TX
Yeah, I know how you feel about your 2nd gen runner, if I had the cash right now and if I knew it was possible I would be all over that swap!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 AM.