95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2JZ on the way!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2004 | 03:02 PM
  #81  
MvCrash's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Greetings,
Cobra, 0-100Mph and stopped in under 11 seconds. That is a published spec. Something to think about. I'm sure the Supra runs good also. All I know If I ever met up with either of them at a stop light, I'd make a right turn.

Mv
Old 08-18-2004 | 03:42 PM
  #82  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
Originally Posted by MvCrash
Greetings,
Cobra, 0-100Mph and stopped in under 11 seconds. That is a published spec. Something to think about. I'm sure the Supra runs good also. All I know If I ever met up with either of them at a stop light, I'd make a right turn.

Mv

Published specs are crap. You got to take it from rear world experience. It will be close, but never as high as stated.

But also, what year of Cobra. 2002-new have quite a bit more power than 2001-older.

2002-newer cobra will take a stock MKIV supra, but spend less then a dollar, and you can have that stock MKIV supra eating the cobra. Lets see what a dollar would do for a cobra.

Last edited by SuperRunner; 08-18-2004 at 03:49 PM.
Old 08-18-2004 | 04:32 PM
  #83  
NCSU-4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
the turbo vs V8 debate always makes me laugh
Old 08-18-2004 | 05:29 PM
  #84  
MvCrash's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Greetings,
I was referring to the 1965 AC Cobra with a 427 Ford Power Plant. Besides, the spec. was'nt published by Ford, it was published by Motor Trend after they tested it. Granted it was on a sticky roadway but that is still some serious acceleration.
And to the debate about Turbo's, blowers, V-8's etc...etc...... I like them all. The faster the better.

MvCrash
Old 08-19-2004 | 06:54 AM
  #85  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
Originally Posted by MvCrash
Greetings,
I was referring to the 1965 AC Cobra with a 427 Ford Power Plant. Besides, the spec. was'nt published by Ford, it was published by Motor Trend after they tested it. Granted it was on a sticky roadway but that is still some serious acceleration.
And to the debate about Turbo's, blowers, V-8's etc...etc...... I like them all. The faster the better.

MvCrash
I don't believe the 1965 AC Cobra with a 427 could ever be considered a production vehicle. There are many vehicles out there that could totally leave a stock supra in the dust, but not many production vehicles. You are talking about a whole different class of cars. Not to mention the price tag.

I can build an 800rwhp 2JZ for under $6,000(assuming I already have the motor).

Last edited by SuperRunner; 08-19-2004 at 06:56 AM.
Old 08-19-2004 | 07:21 AM
  #86  
ken.vs.ryu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
watch out ram srt 10!!!

here's 1khp viper
Old 08-19-2004 | 08:17 AM
  #87  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
Originally Posted by ken.vs.ryu
watch out ram srt 10!!!

here's 1khp viper
Vipers in stock form in my "opinion" are junk. Huge motor with small HP/L. I will tell you what though. A forced induction viper is nothing to joke about. They are increadibly fast. As mentioned earlier, a modded viper will take out a heavily modded supra. You got to compare the size of the engines though. The 2JZ has more potential for HP/L, than the viper, but the viper has a much larger engine.

Then again, how many modded vipers do you see? Very few. A viper is more of a status symbol than a fast car. And as all of my friends know(I HATE STATUS SYMBOLS), but that is just an opinion of mine. Everything else is based on actual facts.
Old 08-19-2004 | 10:58 AM
  #88  
4-RUNNIN' FREAK's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,950
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6059
Old 08-19-2004 | 11:06 AM
  #89  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
Originally Posted by 4-RUNNIN' FREAK
Too bad is it a 1JZ. Only a 2.5L vs the 3.0 2JZ. I would rather have a 7M than a 1JZ.
Old 08-19-2004 | 01:50 PM
  #90  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6755

It is JDM, so ECU, harness, injectors, and turbos will still be needed.

additional cost of about $1,000
Old 08-19-2004 | 04:41 PM
  #91  
MvCrash's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Originally Posted by SuperRunner
I don't believe the 1965 AC Cobra with a 427 could ever be considered a production vehicle. There are many vehicles out there that could totally leave a stock supra in the dust, but not many production vehicles. You are talking about a whole different class of cars. Not to mention the price tag.

I can build an 800rwhp 2JZ for under $6,000(assuming I already have the motor).
Greetings,
The Cobra was certainly a production car. It was required to be a production car in order to race in the class it did.
Sure Cobra's command a steep price today, but back in 65, you could have purchased a Corvette or Cobra for the same money. Production numbers being very low and the performance of the car is what drove the prices up.

Again, I like all cars. I also like seeing what people do with the cars. So if you have a Supra that pumps out 600+ horse, all I can say is this: I WANT A RIDE.

MV
Old 08-23-2010 | 01:05 PM
  #92  
blake.nemitz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 3
From: castle rock
Originally Posted by NX Tacoma
I think your Right!
I was looking at the pro & con of a full locker last night. I think I will stick with limited slip and will get 4.10 gears.
factory Elocker as an option unless you got the 8.4, which is way beef and a great set up for the 2jz
Old 08-23-2010 | 02:27 PM
  #93  
dylan22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: boston/colorado springs
Heres a pertinent build thread on pirate4x4 on a 2nd gen 2jz swap, thought you might be interested, theres some really nice fab work in there.
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=759603

On another note, the factory five cobra my dad and I built has a 351w in it, and in a 2200lb car everything feels fast, even if it isn't a full on 427. Good luck with the project/swap!
Old 08-23-2010 | 02:28 PM
  #94  
SuperRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove UT
Uhm,.....wow!!!
Old 08-23-2010 | 02:32 PM
  #95  
Dan.3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
From: Tinley Park, IL
Did I just travel back in time??????
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:06 AM
  #96  
SkidPalace's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA area
Looks like one of those 2JZs just developed 1.21 Gigawatts as it hit 88 miles per hour.
Old 08-24-2010 | 10:18 AM
  #97  
JBurt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 950
Likes: 21
From: Imperial County CA
Since it's already resurrected, did you ever finish the swap?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MattMcCarthy
All Other Toyota Swaps
29
06-13-2019 03:21 PM
Mike Maiato
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
2
08-28-2015 03:35 AM
WhoahTakeItEasy
Engine Swaps
0
06-19-2015 03:59 AM
Yota4x41994
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
8
03-11-2015 01:46 PM
TOY91Runner
Engine Swaps
19
12-23-2014 02:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 AM.