33X9.5 BFG ATs - what the heck!
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by jimabena74
to me, they are too narrow... i mean if you have enough lift to clear a 33, its best to widen the footprint a little bit as well
#9
Originally Posted by mt_goat
I think it all depends on the conditions where you wheel. For the sand dunes or desert they would suck, for driving on snowy roads they would be great. I think they would also be good on dirt or rocky trails.
thats what I was thinking - I do alot of driving in the snow and really none in sand or mud.. and, and - well
chick dig narrow tires!
(cebby your avatar is great)
#11
Think tractor tires....
Cut through mud and snow and shallow sand on top of hard-pack but in deep sand they might sink. We love the 33x10.5's that's for sure, we've had them on most of our trucks at one time or another.
Cut through mud and snow and shallow sand on top of hard-pack but in deep sand they might sink. We love the 33x10.5's that's for sure, we've had them on most of our trucks at one time or another.
#12
Originally Posted by GodwinAustin
Was wondering if ANYONE was running these....
pics?
pics?
the tire rack measurements on these are 32.1x9.4x16 the bfg's are 32.7x9.5x15, so basically a half inch taller & more tire, less wheel with the 15" rims. Mine has no lift, though I think it needs just a little.
Last edited by tulsa_97SR5; 02-01-2005 at 08:19 PM. Reason: edit: my spelling stinks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[GreatLakes]: 33x12.5x15 bfg ko a\t
muddpigg
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
8
11-02-2015 06:36 AM