performance stats.
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
performance stats.
i am starting this thread so people can post there performance numbers on there vehicles. such as 0-60 times, quarter mile times and horse power ratings. we need real numbers from people who have tested there vehicles. but if you do post your times please tell all mods done to vehicle. this should help the 3.0 vs. 3.4 argument.
#2
Registered User
Thread Starter
so i will start. i have a 93 truck w/ the 3.0. i have done headers and custom exhaust. i also made my own isr. mod from a k&n cold air intake.i also have a k&n drop in air filter. today i hooked up my g- tech meter in my truck for the first time and ran a quater mile run. the first run i ran a 18.8 run. the second time i ran a 18.6 with a 0-60 of 11sec. trap speed was 76 miles per hour. i think i can do better with a few more runs. so lets see some other peoples numbers!! by the way this is with oversized tires 265 70 16 or (31)inch. and stock 430 gears.
Last edited by mr toytech; 03-06-2008 at 06:40 PM.
#3
Registered User
I have a set of dyno runs (4cyl) here:
http://lakebox.dnsalias.com/photos/1...r/engine/dyno/
http://lakebox.dnsalias.com/photos/1...r/engine/dyno/
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
18.14@76mph at 5800ft above sea level;we lose a little over a second in the 1/4 up here with most NA vehicles.
Open deckplate but I am running 32" D load rated tires which hurt me just a little bit along with my automatic tranny.
It is still hard to compare the 3.0 vs a 3.4 since they also come in both PUs and 4Runners but from just my numbers the 3.0 has a ways and mods to go to catch up to a stock 3.4.
Open deckplate but I am running 32" D load rated tires which hurt me just a little bit along with my automatic tranny.
It is still hard to compare the 3.0 vs a 3.4 since they also come in both PUs and 4Runners but from just my numbers the 3.0 has a ways and mods to go to catch up to a stock 3.4.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Point Loma, California
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally stock:
1990 2wd 22re automatic xtracab 0to60 - 13.5 to 14 "less than acceptable"
1993 2wd 3.0 automatic xtracab 0to60 - 9.5 to 10.0 "acceptable"
1990 2wd 22re automatic xtracab 0to60 - 13.5 to 14 "less than acceptable"
1993 2wd 3.0 automatic xtracab 0to60 - 9.5 to 10.0 "acceptable"
Last edited by ernest t bass; 03-07-2008 at 07:39 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
Registered User
R/t.......0.167
60'........2.107
330.......5.762
1/8.......8.711
MPH....84.08
1000....11.234
1/4......13.361
MPH....106.19
.
.
.
.
Oh wait this isnt LS1GTO.com!! Whoops!
As far as the 4runner, I have no idea...
60'........2.107
330.......5.762
1/8.......8.711
MPH....84.08
1000....11.234
1/4......13.361
MPH....106.19
.
.
.
.
Oh wait this isnt LS1GTO.com!! Whoops!
As far as the 4runner, I have no idea...
Last edited by Bumpin' Yota; 03-11-2008 at 07:23 PM.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant find my time slip from Bandimere but the total time was a 15.8 at 84mph. 1990 4runner with a 3.4l supercharged, 4.56 gears with 32" muds. Only a FMU for fuel mods. This summer will be slower due to bigger tires and winch bumper, 4700lbs of fat truck.
#13
Registered User
sorry dude. I don't think most of us Yota types have monthly dyno runs in our schedules, or the opportunity to go out and do a lot of drag racing. I am more interested in spending my weekends exploring the back country of northern BC.
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
as you can tell by the original post it was meant to see the difference between the 3.0 and the 3.4 engine swaps. so if you have no usefull info to post well, dont post.
#20