Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

cpe maf conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2006, 12:58 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Crymson
I've been toying with the same idea, but the reverse logic output of the vafm (5 to 0V) is raining on my parade. My understanding is that most maf and map type sensors run on a scale of 0-5V. So how do we go about inverting the voltage signal to ensure compatability with our factory ecu?
what?

My 3vze VAFM flow meter starts out near zero at idle and as the flapper opens the voltage increases to a max of 5v.

It was the 3vz-fe's who have the inverted Vs voltage...
Old 03-05-2006, 01:19 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Crymson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
what?

My 3vze VAFM flow meter starts out near zero at idle and as the flapper opens the voltage increases to a max of 5v.

It was the 3vz-fe's who have the inverted Vs voltage...
That's strange my vafm starts out around -4V and tops out at about -0.3V when the door is wide open. This is from an '88 3vze, I do have a spare vafm from a 91 3vze, suppose i'll check that one out right now.
Old 03-05-2006, 01:19 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
suprathepeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
what?

My 3vze VAFM flow meter starts out near zero at idle and as the flapper opens the voltage increases to a max of 5v.

It was the 3vz-fe's who have the inverted Vs voltage...
And Supras IIRC.
Old 03-05-2006, 01:38 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Crymson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tested both vafms and they operate in the same manner, with the vehicle off and the ignition on both supply a voltage of 4 and approach 0 when being opened. With the vehicle running, the voltage reads out at 1.5 and approaches 0 with increasing throttle. Now you're saying that your vafm starts at 0 and goes to 5 with increasing throttle?

Somewhat of a sidenote: Supra AFMs do run on the same logic, I have one off a 5mge and those also run from 4.5 to 0V when approaching full range.

Back to the heart of the issue, so assuming you are correct that 3vze vafms run from 0 to 5 volts, then the majority of maf and map sensors run on a scale of 5 to 0 volts or else this statement from Panhead would be untrue.

Originally Posted by panhead
I know he said that it turned out more intense than they thought because the vafm I think Josh said they found out that it works on reverse logic programing.
But knowing what we do about the hotwire type maf sensors: "A hot wire is maintained at a constant temperature in relation to the thermistor by the electronic control circuit. An increase in air flow will cause the hot wire to lose heat faster and the electronic control circuitry will compensate by sending more current through the wire. The electronic control circuit simultaneously measures the current flow and puts out a voltage signal in proportion to current flow" (http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h34.pdf). This denotes that most afms do use a higher voltage to indicate an increase in airflow.

At the end of the day, you are truly lucky if you have a vafm that goes from 0-5v, as any sensor conversion would be easily done with some sort of piggyback system (apexi, splitsec, etc...) In my case though the 5-0 volts is an obstacle in my conversion to another type of air metering system.

Last edited by Crymson; 03-05-2006 at 02:17 PM.
Old 03-05-2006, 05:35 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Weasy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im going to look into it more once i get the engine running again...voltage flip is not a huge problem..
Old 03-05-2006, 09:17 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Crymson
Tested both vafms and they operate in the same manner, with the vehicle off and the ignition on both supply a voltage of 4 and approach 0 when being opened. With the vehicle running, the voltage reads out at 1.5 and approaches 0 with increasing throttle. Now you're saying that your vafm starts at 0 and goes to 5 with increasing throttle?

Somewhat of a sidenote: Supra AFMs do run on the same logic, I have one off a 5mge and those also run from 4.5 to 0V when approaching full range.

Back to the heart of the issue, so assuming you are correct that 3vze vafms run from 0 to 5 volts, then the majority of maf and map sensors run on a scale of 5 to 0 volts or else this statement from Panhead would be untrue.



But knowing what we do about the hotwire type maf sensors: "A hot wire is maintained at a constant temperature in relation to the thermistor by the electronic control circuit. An increase in air flow will cause the hot wire to lose heat faster and the electronic control circuitry will compensate by sending more current through the wire. The electronic control circuit simultaneously measures the current flow and puts out a voltage signal in proportion to current flow" (http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h34.pdf). This denotes that most afms do use a higher voltage to indicate an increase in airflow.

At the end of the day, you are truly lucky if you have a vafm that goes from 0-5v, as any sensor conversion would be easily done with some sort of piggyback system (apexi, splitsec, etc...) In my case though the 5-0 volts is an obstacle in my conversion to another type of air metering system.
Ohhh split second! That was the controller Gadget was recommending I get for the MAF swap! I do have a BIG tax refund...hmmmmm

I dunno, on mine ('90 3vze auto and demo model at the lot) it started out low and went up as I opened the VAFM... I also have a VAFM supposedly from a 7mge bought on ebay and it had the same range. But I shall double check both tomorrow for ya in a study break. (ANP1 lab practical #2 on tuesday...lol - gotta keep this 100% roll going! 3 99%s or better and 4 to go!)

Last edited by Bumpin' Yota; 03-05-2006 at 09:20 PM.
Old 03-05-2006, 11:31 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Weasy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when dealing with a maf swap you should also look into things like timing control...as far as i know yous till cannot ADVANCE timing...which renders this entire swap pointless.

I will be working with this AFM to MAF conversion over the next mth or so in my test 4runner using the smt6's ability to fully control timing as you can push the timing limits when you got the airflow coming in. This plus a cam swap could be some nice power gains...cant wait to get this engine running!
Old 03-06-2006, 06:58 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
hokiruu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Weasy2k
when dealing with a maf swap you should also look into things like timing control...as far as i know yous till cannot ADVANCE timing...which renders this entire swap pointless.

I will be working with this AFM to MAF conversion over the next mth or so in my test 4runner using the smt6's ability to fully control timing as you can push the timing limits when you got the airflow coming in. This plus a cam swap could be some nice power gains...cant wait to get this engine running!
Why would this be pointless without advancing the timing? The stupid flapper is a restriction. Getting rid of it should eliminate or reduce this restriction. Restriction= inefficient. Get rid of restriction= increased efficiency.

Yes playing with the timing could yield more power but does not dictate whether or not getting rid of the flapper is worthwhile.
Old 03-06-2006, 07:12 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
hokiruu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
Ohhh split second! That was the controller Gadget was recommending I get for the MAF swap! I do have a BIG tax refund...hmmmmm

I dunno, on mine ('90 3vze auto and demo model at the lot) it started out low and went up as I opened the VAFM... I also have a VAFM supposedly from a 7mge bought on ebay and it had the same range. But I shall double check both tomorrow for ya in a study break. (ANP1 lab practical #2 on tuesday...lol - gotta keep this 100% roll going! 3 99%s or better and 4 to go!)
Bumpin Yota I also recommend the A'pexi SAFC or Greddy eManage.
Having a visual interface > ambiguous little black box. In the case of theeManage, it can do a hell of a lot more without even costing a ton more. SAFC can control fuel as well.
Old 03-06-2006, 12:17 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Weasy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hokiruu
Why would this be pointless without advancing the timing? The stupid flapper is a restriction. Getting rid of it should eliminate or reduce this restriction. Restriction= inefficient. Get rid of restriction= increased efficiency.

Yes playing with the timing could yield more power but does not dictate whether or not getting rid of the flapper is worthwhile.
Time and money spent you will not see "yields" that you expect from just removing the AFM....UNLESS you do other things like FI...or other head work...

What efficiency you talking about? the ability to FLOW more air? yes but if the engine wont TAKE IN more air...what is going to occur?
Old 03-06-2006, 12:24 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
hokiruu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol i see what you mean. yeah, dollar per wheel horsepower, these damn engines are screwed compared to others. that being said, i know it would not produce any REALLY significant gains at all, but in theory, even with the current timing, I'm sure it would help. Would I spend $500-600 on it? Probably not. As far as the timing goes, what would you propose?
Old 03-06-2006, 12:31 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Weasy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is why i am doing it in conjunction with the cam install. These cams will be able to flow more air through the head and increase the VE of the engine...so the effect of having a MAF will help it out a bit more then just stock for stock.
Taking it a step furthur with timing control could yield some VERY decent gains!
IE: Switching to higher octane fuel and advancing the timing by 5-6 degrees would yield 10-15whp (depending on the engine of course). People have argued with me in the past that you could just turn the distributor, but that effect aint to smart as it will advance the timing across the band vs on certain spots that you want to. Like i would not want to advance the timing 5-6deg near redline for the threat of detonation, but a bit lower yes. You can also flick a switch on the smt6 and go back to stock timing settings and 87 octane when needed

What i am working on now is a little "upgrade" kit that will help give the 3vz-e more guts. How much? I dont know yet...will see in a mth or so's time.
Old 03-07-2006, 02:46 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!

Either someone tagged me with the retard stick several months ago or my 4.99$ Habour Freight DMM was screwing up...grrr!

Got a nice craftsman DMM (that will measure duty cycle ) and now im getting 3.98vdc flapper dead shut, and 0.485 flapper wide open...

Last edited by Bumpin' Yota; 03-07-2006 at 02:49 PM.
Old 03-07-2006, 04:34 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
suprathepeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!
I will not buy harbour freight multi-meters!

Either someone tagged me with the retard stick several months ago or my 4.99$ Habour Freight DMM was screwing up...grrr!

Got a nice craftsman DMM (that will measure duty cycle ) and now im getting 3.98vdc flapper dead shut, and 0.485 flapper wide open...

So this was for the larger supra afm right?
Old 03-07-2006, 04:41 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Weasy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
supra afm?

didnt htey run with karmen vortex
Old 03-08-2006, 01:31 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by suprathepeg
So this was for the larger supra afm right?
No this was for the stock 3vz-e VAFM. I still have to check out the 7mge's VAFM that I have sitting at home....lol
Old 03-11-2006, 10:32 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Crymson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I finally got my car to be California smog compliant again, but once I take it to the station its going back under the knife. I picked up a Split Second ARC2-NE and a 3.5 MAS off ebay for 100 bucks brand new, and will be fabricating a ram air setup for the pickup. So I have the option of using the 5MGE Supra VAFM or this 3.5 MAS from Split Second, to use the split sec unit I will have to make a seperate fuel pump switch and relocate the intake air temp sensor, but here is the dillema. Should I bother with the hassle of using the MAS or should I just use the 5MGE as the flow should be more than adequate. And IF I do choose to use the MAS theres that little "voltage flip," issue that I don't know how to tackle. If i find my camara, I could take pics... this MAS is absolutely huge
Old 04-12-2006, 12:31 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
enutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ummmm.......???????????????
Old 04-12-2006, 12:45 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Crymson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by enutter
ummmm.......???????????????
Great question, what happend to this?
Old 04-15-2006, 06:06 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
agusgus3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Split second has these two options:
PSC1-004 Programmable Sig. Cal. AFM to MAF-$339
PSC1-005 Prog. Sig. Cal. AFM to MAF w/Inv. Output-$339

this would solve the issue of voltage inversion, accomodate the maf, potential of FI or NA, as well as choice of which maf you want to use.

personally, im going to research some GM 3" maf's or mitsubishi turbo maf's, the psc1-005, or Apexi SAFC and my old solid state book on voltage inversion. see what i can come up with.

just found the FTC1, Fuel/Timing Calibrator, fully programmable. perfect for me, strapping on the the turbo this summer once the old V6 is rebuilt. little pricey at $529, though.

Last edited by agusgus3; 04-15-2006 at 06:24 PM.


Quick Reply: cpe maf conversion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.