Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

31" - 32" - or 33" with 4.88 gears. What you think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2007, 03:57 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
xcmountain80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As im not familiar with the power curve of the 22R I know my brother just went to 4.88's with 35's I have 33's and 4.10's and need 4.56's .


Aaron
Old 05-01-2007, 06:28 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
elripster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by CoedNaked
If I gave you a truck with 33" tires and one with 31" tires and I told you to wheel them down a trail, and I didn't tell you which had which tires, and I did the bare minimum next to nothing to clear the 33" tires, I guarantee that from the drivers seat, you couldn't tell the difference in offroad performance, but you might from the loss of power, braking, & gearing.
This is not true. There are other advantages to the larger tire which will give it away.

- Larger contact patch on the ground.
- More clearance after airing down.
- A tire running at a lower PSI and therefore better conforming to the ground for more traction.
- Better shock absorbing characteristics.
- Tire lugs are typically spread farther apart which also improves off road traction.
- Louder on the road.

Trust, you'd know right away which truck you were in. I have ran 31's, 32's, and 33's. The differences on and off road were stark.

Frank
Old 05-02-2007, 08:04 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
deSCHUTTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is the inch of clearance worth the loss of power?

Last edited by deSCHUTTER; 05-02-2007 at 08:06 PM.
Old 05-03-2007, 12:24 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Mattabilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick hijack, how about 32/10.5 with a 3.0 manual with stock 4.55s?
Old 05-03-2007, 02:03 PM
  #45  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Should be fine (assuming you have manual trans), but what tires come in 32x10.50? I REALLY don't see why people do 32's ... at least go to 33's and get some ground clearance benefit.
Old 05-03-2007, 02:39 PM
  #46  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
RustBucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,804
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
All I know is that I'm going to go with some 33x9.5's to match my 4.88/5spd/22re setup. Once I get some cash.

There's a great tech article that people bring up from time to time that talks about how a narrower tire really allows for much better traction. Apparently the length of the contact patch is more important than the width. That would be a fascinating thing to study.
Old 05-03-2007, 04:03 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Mattabilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My bad, I meant 32x11.5. This is a dd and I didn't want to go too big.
Old 05-03-2007, 04:26 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
FredTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ USA Age:60
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by deSCHUTTER
is the inch of clearance worth the loss of power?
You obviously don't wheel in anything "big" where clearance is at a premimum ....






Fred
Old 05-03-2007, 06:02 PM
  #49  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RustBucket
There's a great tech article that people bring up from time to time that talks about how a narrower tire really allows for much better traction. Apparently the length of the contact patch is more important than the width. That would be a fascinating thing to study.
You mean this one?
http://www.expeditionswest.com/resea...tion_rev1.html
Old 05-03-2007, 07:39 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Brad.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Well I ran the 4.88s with 31s for about the first 45,000 miles on my truck (it came stock that way) and even brand new (in 1993), near sea level, in the the flat lands here, it couldn't hold OD on a slight incline at 70mph. I think it's ridiculous that Toyota geared the 4-speed, 3.slo to go 130 mph when it doesn't have the power to hold 70mph into a headwind or up a very slight incline without down shifting to 3rd gear.

Really??? they will go 130mph??? I can definatly relate to the 70mph slight incline deal but ive never pushed it to top speed.
Old 05-04-2007, 05:27 AM
  #51  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Brad.
Really??? they will go 130mph??? I can definatly relate to the 70mph slight incline deal but ive never pushed it to top speed.
I didn't say it would go 130mph lol (at least not with the 3.slo engine in there) I said Toyota GEARED it to go 130 mph. I'm using a gearing calculator to estimate the top speed if the engine had the power to pull the truck to 130 mph.

Here's a good calculator:
http://www.grimmjeeper.com/gears.html

With the A340H tranny, 4.88 gearing, 31 inch tires the speed at 5000 rpms (still below redline BTW) would be 133 mph. Of course the ECU also has the speed limiter to cut fuel off at around 105 mph IIRC.

Its just a mistake IMHO that Toyota engineers put an OD gear in the 4 speed autos that is higher than 5th gear on the manuals but with one less gear available to get up to that gear. So as we regear our trucks for bigger tires why should we use the Toyota factory gearing as the "gold standard" for the way it should be? I corrected their mistake and loved the results.

Last edited by mt_goat; 05-04-2007 at 05:29 AM.
Old 05-13-2007, 07:17 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Brad.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
I didn't say it would go 130mph lol (at least not with the 3.slo engine in there) I said Toyota GEARED it to go 130 mph. I'm using a gearing calculator to estimate the top speed if the engine had the power to pull the truck to 130 mph.
oh yeah I understand what your saying now... I am sooo tired of dealing with the auto tranny on the highway. I can hardly cruise up any incline without having to really floor it in 4th gear. and sometimes the cruise control can't handle doing 50 - 65 mph on a flat road without shifting out of overdrive, it kills me!!! im thinking of trying a manual swap but I won't be able to do the work myself (without help of someone who knows what thier doing). just don't know if its worth the trouble. thanks for clearing that up goat
Old 05-14-2007, 03:42 AM
  #53  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
You don't have to swap the auto out, just get the gearing set right.
Old 05-16-2007, 07:43 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
Brad.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think mine must have 4.88's right???? I really don't know, but I read somewhere that the auto 4runners of 93' era all came stock with 4.88's?
Where can I find out?

thanks dudes
Old 05-16-2007, 07:53 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
FredTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ USA Age:60
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brad.
i think mine must have 4.88's right???? I really don't know, but I read somewhere that the auto 4runners of 93' era all came stock with 4.88's?
Where can I find out?

thanks dudes
IF they came with the 31" tire package.
Look at your codes on the label on the door jamb.
That'll tell you for sure.



Fred
Old 05-17-2007, 04:55 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Victor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought everyone's door jamb sticker mentioned 225/75r15. There was a long topic about that a while back. One way to see is check the size of your spare tire. Best way is to crack one of the diffs open but you can put a chalk line on a tire and the driveshaft. Count the driveshaft revs vs the tire to turn 1 rev.
Old 05-17-2007, 03:22 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
FredTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ USA Age:60
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Victor
I thought everyone's door jamb sticker mentioned 225/75r15. There was a long topic about that a while back. One way to see is check the size of your spare tire. Best way is to crack one of the diffs open but you can put a chalk line on a tire and the driveshaft. Count the driveshaft revs vs the tire to turn 1 rev.
There's more than just the tire size there.
It also has the tranny code and gear ratio (diffs).



Fred
Old 05-17-2007, 04:12 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Alex 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what i know about mine is, with the 1994 4wd, limited SR5 3.slow and a 5 speed, it came with 4.88's and 31' tires. I climbed under it when i was checking the brakes and did the chalk line test and i roughly got 4.88. The door sticker on these often didn't say that they came with 31/10.50, they just 225/75. The hoist for the spare on the 225/75 models is different then the 31/10.50 model. also the gas tank is bigger on the 31" models too.
Old 05-18-2007, 04:45 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Victor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True that Fred
Old 05-18-2007, 04:53 AM
  #60  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Alex 400
From what i know about mine is, with the 1994 4wd, limited SR5 3.slow and a 5 speed, it came with 4.88's and 31' tires. I climbed under it when i was checking the brakes and did the chalk line test and i roughly got 4.88. The door sticker on these often didn't say that they came with 31/10.50, they just 225/75. The hoist for the spare on the 225/75 models is different then the 31/10.50 model. also the gas tank is bigger on the 31" models too.
I've never heard of a 5 speed coming from the factory with 4.88s, you sure about that? Maybe the PO changed them


Quick Reply: 31" - 32" - or 33" with 4.88 gears. What you think?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM.