Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Timing Belt - to replace or not to replace?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2009, 10:21 PM
  #21  
Contributing Member
 
youngbuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rocket
IMO the timing belt 90k interval is a joke and nothing more than a sleazy way to milk money.
The so-called "interval" should be 130K+ ...evidence of that is overwhelming.
This is true. ^

I would rate the 3.4's timing belt life at roughly 120k, easilly. Considering your belt has 75k on it now, I'd easily run it another 40-45k no sweat. That is, of course, if don't have any other timing belt related parts failure(s) beforehand like pulleys/idlers, water pump, tensioner, crank or cam seals, etc.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
voiddweller
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
19
05-02-2016 09:10 PM
stagger_lee
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
6
03-29-2016 06:27 PM
layifioren
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
07-06-2015 02:26 PM
marcusSRG
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
20
06-27-2015 07:13 AM
infinityisfive
Other Makes Cars/Trucks
0
06-16-2015 06:51 PM



Quick Reply: Timing Belt - to replace or not to replace?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM.